This module uses fundamental data of Saratoga Investment to approximate its Piotroski F score. Saratoga Investment F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Saratoga Investment Corp. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Saratoga Investment financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out Saratoga Investment Altman Z Score, Saratoga Investment Correlation, Saratoga Investment Valuation, as well as analyze Saratoga Investment Alpha and Beta and Saratoga Investment Hype Analysis.
Saratoga
Piotroski F Score
Market Cap
Enterprise Value
Price To Sales Ratio
Dividend Yield
Ptb Ratio
Days Sales Outstanding
Book Value Per Share
Free Cash Flow Yield
Operating Cash Flow Per Share
Average Payables
Pb Ratio
Ev To Sales
Free Cash Flow Per Share
Roic
Inventory Turnover
Net Income Per Share
Days Of Inventory On Hand
Payables Turnover
Sales General And Administrative To Revenue
Average Inventory
Cash Per Share
Pocfratio
Interest Coverage
Payout Ratio
Pfcf Ratio
Days Payables Outstanding
Income Quality
Roe
Ev To Operating Cash Flow
Pe Ratio
Return On Tangible Assets
Ev To Free Cash Flow
Earnings Yield
Net Debt To E B I T D A
Current Ratio
Tangible Book Value Per Share
Receivables Turnover
Graham Number
Shareholders Equity Per Share
Debt To Equity
Graham Net Net
Average Receivables
Revenue Per Share
Interest Debt Per Share
Debt To Assets
Enterprise Value Over E B I T D A
Short Term Coverage Ratios
Price Earnings Ratio
Operating Cycle
Price Book Value Ratio
Price Earnings To Growth Ratio
Days Of Payables Outstanding
Dividend Payout Ratio
Price To Operating Cash Flows Ratio
Price To Free Cash Flows Ratio
Pretax Profit Margin
Ebt Per Ebit
Operating Profit Margin
Effective Tax Rate
Company Equity Multiplier
Long Term Debt To Capitalization
Total Debt To Capitalization
Return On Capital Employed
Debt Equity Ratio
Ebit Per Revenue
Quick Ratio
Dividend Paid And Capex Coverage Ratio
Net Income Per E B T
Cash Ratio
Cash Conversion Cycle
Operating Cash Flow Sales Ratio
Days Of Inventory Outstanding
Days Of Sales Outstanding
Cash Flow Coverage Ratios
Price To Book Ratio
Price Cash Flow Ratio
Enterprise Value Multiple
Debt Ratio
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio
Price Sales Ratio
Return On Assets
Asset Turnover
Net Profit Margin
Gross Profit Margin
Price Fair Value
Return On Equity
Change In Working Capital
Net Income
Total Cash From Financing Activities
End Period Cash Flow
Change To Liabilities
Sale Purchase Of Stock
Change In Cash
Free Cash Flow
Begin Period Cash Flow
Other Cashflows From Financing Activities
Depreciation
Other Non Cash Items
Dividends Paid
Total Cash From Operating Activities
Change To Account Receivables
Net Borrowings
Change To Operating Activities
Change To Netincome
Stock Based Compensation
Issuance Of Capital Stock
Total Assets
Other Current Liab
Total Current Liabilities
Total Stockholder Equity
Other Liab
Retained Earnings
Cash
Non Currrent Assets Other
Other Assets
Common Stock Shares Outstanding
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity
Total Liab
Short Long Term Debt Total
Net Debt
Accounts Payable
Non Current Assets Total
Long Term Debt
Cash And Short Term Investments
Net Receivables
Common Stock Total Equity
Short Term Investments
Non Current Liabilities Total
Other Stockholder Equity
Total Current Assets
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Common Stock
Short Term Debt
Net Tangible Assets
Other Current Assets
Long Term Investments
Short Long Term Debt
Long Term Debt Total
Capital Surpluse
Deferred Long Term Liab
Cash And Equivalents
Net Invested Capital
Current Deferred Revenue
Inventory
Capital Stock
Interest Expense
Selling General Administrative
Gross Profit
Other Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Ebit
Ebitda
Cost Of Revenue
Total Operating Expenses
Income Before Tax
Depreciation And Amortization
Total Revenue
Total Other Income Expense Net
Income Tax Expense
Net Income Applicable To Common Shares
Net Income From Continuing Ops
Non Recurring
Interest Income
Net Interest Income
Tax Provision
Research Development
Probability Of Bankruptcy
At this time, Saratoga Investment's Net Debt is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 03/21/2025, Short Term Debt is likely to grow to about 677.8 B, while Long Term Debt is likely to drop slightly above 212.5 M. At this time, Saratoga Investment's Payout Ratio is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 03/21/2025, Days Payables Outstanding is likely to grow to 3,004, while Dividend Yield is likely to drop 0.11.
At this time, it appears that Saratoga Investment's Piotroski F Score is Frail. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Saratoga Investment is to make sure Saratoga is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Saratoga Investment's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Saratoga Investment's financial numbers are properly reported.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Saratoga Investment's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Saratoga Investment in a much-optimized way.
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Saratoga Investment's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Saratoga Investment's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social
About Saratoga Investment Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Saratoga Investment Corp's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Saratoga Investment using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Saratoga Investment Corp based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Saratoga Investment position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Saratoga Investment will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Saratoga Investment could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Saratoga Investment when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Saratoga Investment - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Saratoga Investment Corp to buy it.
The correlation of Saratoga Investment is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Saratoga Investment moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Saratoga Investment Corp moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Saratoga Investment can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
When running Saratoga Investment's price analysis, check to measure Saratoga Investment's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Saratoga Investment is operating at the current time. Most of Saratoga Investment's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Saratoga Investment's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Saratoga Investment's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Saratoga Investment to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.