Correlation Between Winning Brands and Procter Gamble

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Winning Brands and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Winning Brands and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Winning Brands Corp and Procter Gamble, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Winning Brands and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Winning Brands with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Winning Brands and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Winning Brands and Procter Gamble

0.54

Correlation Coefficient

Winning Brands  Procter Gamble

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Winning and Procter is 0.54. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Winning Brands Corp and Procter Gamble in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble and Winning Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Winning Brands Corp are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble has no effect on the direction of Winning Brands i.e., Winning Brands and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Winning Brands and Procter Gamble

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Winning Brands Corp is expected to generate 210.55 times more return on investment than Procter Gamble. However, Winning Brands is 210.55 times more volatile than Procter Gamble. It trades about 0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble is currently generating about -0.14 per unit of risk. If you would invest  0.00  in Winning Brands Corp on October 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.01  from holding Winning Brands Corp or generate 9.223372036854776E16% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Winning Brands Corp  vs.  Procter Gamble

Winning Brands Corp

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Winning Brands Corp are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather conflicting fundamental drivers, Winning Brands exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Procter Gamble

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Pair Trading with Winning Brands and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Winning Brands and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Winning Brands position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.

The idea behind Winning Brands Corp and Procter Gamble pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.