Correlation Between Estee Lauder and Procter Gamble

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Estee Lauder and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Estee Lauder and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Estee Lauder Companies and Procter Gamble, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Estee Lauder and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Estee Lauder with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Estee Lauder and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Estee Lauder and Procter Gamble

-0.08
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Estee and Procter is -0.08. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Estee Lauder Companies and Procter Gamble in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble and Estee Lauder is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Estee Lauder Companies are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble has no effect on the direction of Estee Lauder i.e., Estee Lauder and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Estee Lauder and Procter Gamble

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Estee Lauder Companies is expected to generate 2.48 times more return on investment than Procter Gamble. However, Estee Lauder is 2.48 times more volatile than Procter Gamble. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  7,212  in Estee Lauder Companies on November 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  266.00  from holding Estee Lauder Companies or generate 3.69% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Estee Lauder Companies  vs.  Procter Gamble

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Estee Lauder Companies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Estee Lauder Companies are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite uncertain essential indicators, Estee Lauder may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in March 2025.
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Estee Lauder and Procter Gamble Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Estee Lauder and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Estee Lauder and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Estee Lauder position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.
The idea behind Estee Lauder Companies and Procter Gamble pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance