Correlation Between Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Colgate Palmolive with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble

0.65

Correlation Coefficient

Colgate Palmolive  Procter Gamble

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Colgate and Procter is 0.65. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble and Colgate Palmolive is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Colgate Palmolive are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble has no effect on the direction of Colgate Palmolive i.e., Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Colgate Palmolive is expected to generate 1.2 times more return on investment than Procter Gamble. However, Colgate Palmolive is 1.2 times more volatile than Procter Gamble. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  9,028  in Colgate Palmolive on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  291.00  from holding Colgate Palmolive or generate 3.22% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Colgate Palmolive  vs.  Procter Gamble

Colgate Palmolive

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Colgate Palmolive are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite persistent essential indicators, Colgate Palmolive is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price mess, may contribute to short-term losses for the institutional investors.

Procter Gamble

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Pair Trading with Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Colgate Palmolive position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.

The idea behind Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.