Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Morgan Stanley

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Morgan Stanley at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Morgan Stanley into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Morgan Stanley Direct, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Morgan Stanley and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Morgan Stanley. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Morgan Stanley.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Morgan Stanley

0.45

Correlation Coefficient

Procter Gamble  Morgan Stanley

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Morgan is 0.45. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Morgan Stanley Direct in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Morgan Stanley Direct and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Morgan Stanley. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Morgan Stanley Direct has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Morgan Stanley go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Morgan Stanley

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 0.87 times more return on investment than Morgan Stanley. However, Procter Gamble is 1.16 times less risky than Morgan Stanley. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Morgan Stanley Direct is currently generating about -0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  16,456  in Procter Gamble on October 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  168.00  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 1.02% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Morgan Stanley Direct

Procter Gamble

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Morgan Stanley Direct

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Morgan Stanley Direct are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite persistent fundamental indicators, Morgan Stanley is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price mess, may contribute to short-term losses for the institutional investors.

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Morgan Stanley

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Morgan Stanley positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Morgan Stanley can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Morgan Stanley will offset losses from the drop in Morgan Stanley's long position.

The idea behind Procter Gamble and Morgan Stanley Direct pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.