Correlation Between Lincoln Electric and Procter Gamble

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Lincoln Electric and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Lincoln Electric and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Lincoln Electric Holdings and Procter Gamble, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Lincoln Electric and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Lincoln Electric with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Lincoln Electric and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Lincoln Electric and Procter Gamble

0.34

Correlation Coefficient

Lincoln Electric  Procter Gamble

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Lincoln and Procter is 0.34. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Lincoln Electric Holdings and Procter Gamble in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble and Lincoln Electric is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Lincoln Electric Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble has no effect on the direction of Lincoln Electric i.e., Lincoln Electric and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Lincoln Electric and Procter Gamble

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Lincoln Electric Holdings is expected to generate 1.58 times more return on investment than Procter Gamble. However, Lincoln Electric is 1.58 times more volatile than Procter Gamble. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  18,749  in Lincoln Electric Holdings on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  280.00  from holding Lincoln Electric Holdings or generate 1.49% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Lincoln Electric Holdings  vs.  Procter Gamble

Lincoln Electric Holdings

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Lincoln Electric Holdings are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy fundamental indicators, Lincoln Electric is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Procter Gamble

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Pair Trading with Lincoln Electric and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Lincoln Electric and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Lincoln Electric position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.

The idea behind Lincoln Electric Holdings and Procter Gamble pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Economic Indicators module to top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing.