Correlation Between Canterbury Park and Churchill Downs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Canterbury Park and Churchill Downs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Canterbury Park and Churchill Downs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Canterbury Park Holding and Churchill Downs Incorporated, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Canterbury Park and Churchill Downs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Canterbury Park with a short position of Churchill Downs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Canterbury Park and Churchill Downs.

Diversification Opportunities for Canterbury Park and Churchill Downs

0.34
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Canterbury and Churchill is 0.34. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Canterbury Park Holding and Churchill Downs Incorporated in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Churchill Downs and Canterbury Park is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Canterbury Park Holding are associated (or correlated) with Churchill Downs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Churchill Downs has no effect on the direction of Canterbury Park i.e., Canterbury Park and Churchill Downs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Canterbury Park and Churchill Downs

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Canterbury Park Holding is expected to generate 1.42 times more return on investment than Churchill Downs. However, Canterbury Park is 1.42 times more volatile than Churchill Downs Incorporated. It trades about -0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Churchill Downs Incorporated is currently generating about -0.23 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,097  in Canterbury Park Holding on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (270.00) from holding Canterbury Park Holding or give up 12.88% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Canterbury Park Holding  vs.  Churchill Downs Incorporated

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Canterbury Park Holding 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Canterbury Park Holding has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.
Churchill Downs 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Churchill Downs Incorporated has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's fundamental indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.

Canterbury Park and Churchill Downs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Canterbury Park and Churchill Downs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Canterbury Park and Churchill Downs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Canterbury Park position performs unexpectedly, Churchill Downs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Churchill Downs will offset losses from the drop in Churchill Downs' long position.
The idea behind Canterbury Park Holding and Churchill Downs Incorporated pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.

Other Complementary Tools

Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges