Correlation Between Citigroup and Precious Metals

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Precious Metals at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Precious Metals into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Precious Metals Ultrasector, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Precious Metals and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Precious Metals. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Precious Metals.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Precious Metals

0.13
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Precious is 0.13. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Precious Metals Ultrasector in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Precious Metals Ultr and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Precious Metals. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Precious Metals Ultr has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Precious Metals go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Precious Metals

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 25.27 times less return on investment than Precious Metals. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Citigroup is 1.32 times less risky than Precious Metals. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Precious Metals Ultrasector is currently generating about 0.28 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,796  in Precious Metals Ultrasector on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,078  from holding Precious Metals Ultrasector or generate 54.74% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Precious Metals Ultrasector

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound fundamental indicators, Citigroup is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Precious Metals Ultr 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Precious Metals Ultrasector are ranked lower than 22 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Precious Metals showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Citigroup and Precious Metals Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Precious Metals

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Precious Metals positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Precious Metals can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Precious Metals will offset losses from the drop in Precious Metals' long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Precious Metals Ultrasector pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Screener module to find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook..

Other Complementary Tools

Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine