Correlation Between Citigroup and Gaming Corps

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Gaming Corps at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Gaming Corps into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Gaming Corps AB, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Gaming Corps and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Gaming Corps. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Gaming Corps.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Gaming Corps

-0.44

Correlation Coefficient

Citigroup  Gaming Corps

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Gaming is -0.44. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Gaming Corps AB in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Gaming Corps AB and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Gaming Corps. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Gaming Corps AB has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Gaming Corps go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Gaming Corps

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 0.35 times more return on investment than Gaming Corps. However, Citigroup is 2.85 times less risky than Gaming Corps. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Gaming Corps AB is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,219  in Citigroup on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,700  from holding Citigroup or generate 64.0% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	99.2%
Values	Daily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Gaming Corps AB

Citigroup

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady fundamental indicators, Citigroup may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Gaming Corps AB

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Gaming Corps AB has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Gaming Corps

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Gaming Corps positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Gaming Corps can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Gaming Corps will offset losses from the drop in Gaming Corps' long position.

The idea behind Citigroup and Gaming Corps AB pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the AI Portfolio Architect module to use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities.