Correlation Between Kancera AB and Gaming Corps

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Kancera AB and Gaming Corps at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Kancera AB and Gaming Corps into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Kancera AB and Gaming Corps AB, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Kancera AB and Gaming Corps and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Kancera AB with a short position of Gaming Corps. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Kancera AB and Gaming Corps.

Diversification Opportunities for Kancera AB and Gaming Corps

0.58
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Kancera and Gaming is 0.58. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Kancera AB and Gaming Corps AB in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Gaming Corps AB and Kancera AB is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Kancera AB are associated (or correlated) with Gaming Corps. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Gaming Corps AB has no effect on the direction of Kancera AB i.e., Kancera AB and Gaming Corps go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Kancera AB and Gaming Corps

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Kancera AB is expected to under-perform the Gaming Corps. In addition to that, Kancera AB is 1.39 times more volatile than Gaming Corps AB. It trades about -0.12 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Gaming Corps AB is currently generating about -0.08 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  100.00  in Gaming Corps AB on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (33.00) from holding Gaming Corps AB or give up 33.0% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Kancera AB  vs.  Gaming Corps AB

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Kancera AB 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Kancera AB has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.
Gaming Corps AB 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Gaming Corps AB has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Kancera AB and Gaming Corps Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Kancera AB and Gaming Corps

The main advantage of trading using opposite Kancera AB and Gaming Corps positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Kancera AB position performs unexpectedly, Gaming Corps can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Gaming Corps will offset losses from the drop in Gaming Corps' long position.
The idea behind Kancera AB and Gaming Corps AB pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.

Other Complementary Tools

Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account