Correlation Between Blackstone Secured and Columbia Seligman
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Blackstone Secured and Columbia Seligman at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Blackstone Secured and Columbia Seligman into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Blackstone Secured Lending and Columbia Seligman Munications, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Blackstone Secured and Columbia Seligman and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Blackstone Secured with a short position of Columbia Seligman. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Blackstone Secured and Columbia Seligman.
Diversification Opportunities for Blackstone Secured and Columbia Seligman
0.05 | Correlation Coefficient |
Significant diversification
The 3 months correlation between Blackstone and Columbia is 0.05. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Blackstone Secured Lending and Columbia Seligman Munications in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Seligman and Blackstone Secured is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Blackstone Secured Lending are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Seligman. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Seligman has no effect on the direction of Blackstone Secured i.e., Blackstone Secured and Columbia Seligman go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Blackstone Secured and Columbia Seligman
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Blackstone Secured Lending is expected to generate 0.73 times more return on investment than Columbia Seligman. However, Blackstone Secured Lending is 1.37 times less risky than Columbia Seligman. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Seligman Munications is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest 1,816 in Blackstone Secured Lending on October 9, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,349 from holding Blackstone Secured Lending or generate 74.28% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Blackstone Secured Lending vs. Columbia Seligman Munications
Performance |
Timeline |
Blackstone Secured |
Columbia Seligman |
Blackstone Secured and Columbia Seligman Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Blackstone Secured and Columbia Seligman
The main advantage of trading using opposite Blackstone Secured and Columbia Seligman positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Blackstone Secured position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Seligman can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Seligman will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Seligman's long position.Blackstone Secured vs. Carlyle Secured Lending | Blackstone Secured vs. Oaktree Specialty Lending | Blackstone Secured vs. Sixth Street Specialty | Blackstone Secured vs. FS KKR Capital |
Columbia Seligman vs. Investec Global Franchise | Columbia Seligman vs. Rbb Fund Trust | Columbia Seligman vs. Wisdomtree Siegel Global | Columbia Seligman vs. Scharf Global Opportunity |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences | |
ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments | |
Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world | |
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume |