Correlation Between Scharf Global and Columbia Seligman

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Scharf Global and Columbia Seligman at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Scharf Global and Columbia Seligman into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Scharf Global Opportunity and Columbia Seligman Munications, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Scharf Global and Columbia Seligman and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Scharf Global with a short position of Columbia Seligman. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Scharf Global and Columbia Seligman.

Diversification Opportunities for Scharf Global and Columbia Seligman

0.73
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Scharf and Columbia is 0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Scharf Global Opportunity and Columbia Seligman Munications in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Seligman and Scharf Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Scharf Global Opportunity are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Seligman. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Seligman has no effect on the direction of Scharf Global i.e., Scharf Global and Columbia Seligman go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Scharf Global and Columbia Seligman

Assuming the 90 days horizon Scharf Global is expected to generate 4.89 times less return on investment than Columbia Seligman. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Scharf Global Opportunity is 2.28 times less risky than Columbia Seligman. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Seligman Munications is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  12,970  in Columbia Seligman Munications on October 9, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,622  from holding Columbia Seligman Munications or generate 20.22% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Scharf Global Opportunity  vs.  Columbia Seligman Munications

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Scharf Global Opportunity 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Scharf Global Opportunity has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Scharf Global is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Columbia Seligman 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Columbia Seligman Munications has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Columbia Seligman is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Scharf Global and Columbia Seligman Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Scharf Global and Columbia Seligman

The main advantage of trading using opposite Scharf Global and Columbia Seligman positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Scharf Global position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Seligman can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Seligman will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Seligman's long position.
The idea behind Scharf Global Opportunity and Columbia Seligman Munications pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.

Other Complementary Tools

Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements