Correlation Between Southern California and Glacier Bancorp

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Southern California and Glacier Bancorp at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Southern California and Glacier Bancorp into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Southern California Bancorp and Glacier Bancorp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Southern California and Glacier Bancorp and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Southern California with a short position of Glacier Bancorp. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Southern California and Glacier Bancorp.

Diversification Opportunities for Southern California and Glacier Bancorp

0.87

Correlation Coefficient

Southern California  Glacier Bancorp

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Southern and Glacier is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Southern California Bancorp and Glacier Bancorp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Glacier Bancorp and Southern California is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Southern California Bancorp are associated (or correlated) with Glacier Bancorp. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Glacier Bancorp has no effect on the direction of Southern California i.e., Southern California and Glacier Bancorp go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Southern California and Glacier Bancorp

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Southern California Bancorp is expected to generate 0.88 times more return on investment than Glacier Bancorp. However, Southern California Bancorp is 1.14 times less risky than Glacier Bancorp. It trades about 0.4 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Glacier Bancorp is currently generating about 0.19 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,458  in Southern California Bancorp on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  334.00  from holding Southern California Bancorp or generate 22.91% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Southern California Bancorp  vs.  Glacier Bancorp

Southern California

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Southern California Bancorp are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite inconsistent basic indicators, Southern California disclosed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Glacier Bancorp

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Glacier Bancorp are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly inconsistent fundamental indicators, Glacier Bancorp demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Southern California and Glacier Bancorp

The main advantage of trading using opposite Southern California and Glacier Bancorp positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Southern California position performs unexpectedly, Glacier Bancorp can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Glacier Bancorp will offset losses from the drop in Glacier Bancorp's long position.

The idea behind Southern California Bancorp and Glacier Bancorp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Manager module to state of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital.