Microsoft (Chile) Executives
| MSFT Stock | USD 416.74 0.11 0.03% |
Microsoft employs about 221 K people. The company is managed by 10 executives with a total tenure of roughly 32 years, averaging almost 3.0 years of service per executive, having 22100.0 employees per reported executive. Analysis of Microsoft's management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
| Satya Nadella CEO CEO, Director |
| Christopher Capossela President Executive Vice President Marketing and Consumer Business, and Chief Marketing Officer |
Microsoft |
Microsoft Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1483 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1483 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.3931 %, meaning that it generated $0.3931 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Microsoft's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Microsoft manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Microsoft Workforce Comparison
Microsoft is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Software - Infrastructure industry is now estimated at about 462,229. Microsoft totals roughly 221,000 in number of employees claiming about 48% of equities listed under Software - Infrastructure industry.
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.33 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.41 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.41. Microsoft Notable Stakeholders
A Microsoft stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Microsoft often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Microsoft's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Microsoft's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Satya Nadella | CEO, Director | Profile | |
| Christopher Capossela | Executive Vice President Marketing and Consumer Business, and Chief Marketing Officer | Profile | |
| Amy Hood | CFO, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Bradford LCA | Pres Chairman | Profile | |
| Judson Althoff | Ex Officer | Profile | |
| Brett Iversen | Gen Relations | Profile | |
| Christopher Young | Strategy Devel | Profile | |
| Alice Jolla | Co Officer | Profile | |
| Frank Shaw | Corp Communications | Profile | |
| Keith Esq | Deputy VP | Profile |
About Microsoft Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Microsoft often depends on how effective the management is. Microsoft management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Microsoft management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Microsoft management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Microsoft Corporation develops, licenses, and supports software, services, devices, and solutions worldwide. The company was founded in 1975 and is headquartered in Redmond, Washington. MICROSOFT CORP operates under Software - Infrastructure classification in Exotistan and is traded on Commodity Exchange.
Microsoft Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Microsoft use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Microsoft within its industry.Microsoft Manpower Efficiency
Return on Microsoft Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 897.1K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 19.8B | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 329.1K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 7.3B |
Additional Information and Resources on Investing in Microsoft Stock
When determining whether Microsoft is a good investment, qualitative aspects like company management, corporate governance, and ethical practices play a significant role. A comparison with peer companies also provides context and helps to understand if Microsoft Stock is undervalued or overvalued. This multi-faceted approach, blending both quantitative and qualitative analysis, forms a solid foundation for making an informed investment decision about Microsoft Stock. Highlighted below are key reports to facilitate an investment decision about Microsoft Stock:Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.