Microsoft Net Worth
Microsoft Net Worth Breakdown | MSFT |
Microsoft Net Worth Analysis
Microsoft's net worth analysis, or its valuation, is the process of determining the total value of the company. This involves assessing a range of factors, including Microsoft's financial performance, assets, liabilities, and potential for growth. The ultimate goal is to provide a clear understanding of Microsoft's overall worth, which can help investors make informed investment decisions. There are several methods that can be used to perform Microsoft's net worth analysis. One common approach is to calculate Microsoft's market capitalization.Another approach is to use the price-to-earnings ratio (P/E ratio), which compares Microsoft's stock price to its earnings per share (EPS). Discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis is another popular method for assessing Microsoft's net worth. This approach calculates the present value of Microsoft's future cash flows, taking into account factors such as growth rate, profitability, and risk. By comparing the present value of Microsoft's cash flows to its current stock price, investors can gain a better understanding of the company's overall value. Finally, investors may use comparable company analysis to evaluate Microsoft's net worth. This involves comparing Microsoft's financial metrics to similar companies in the same industry. By identifying companies with similar financial characteristics, investors can gain insight into Microsoft's net worth relative to its peers.
Enterprise Value |
|
To determine if Microsoft is a good investment, evaluating the company's potential for future growth is also very important. This may include expanding into new markets, launching new products or services, or improving operational efficiency. Companies with strong growth prospects can be more attractive investments. This aspect of the research should be conducted in the context of the overall market and industry in which the company operates and should include an analysis of growth potential, competitive landscape, and any regulatory or economic factors that could impact the business. Some of the essential points regarding Microsoft's net worth research are outlined below:
Microsoft generated a negative expected return over the last 90 days | |
Microsoft has a strong financial position based on the latest SEC filings | |
About 74.0% of the company shares are owned by institutional investors | |
Latest headline from fool.com: Why Lumen Stock Sank Today |
Microsoft Quarterly Good Will |
|
Microsoft uses earnings reports to provide investors with an update of all three financial statements, including the income statement, the balance sheet, and the cash flow statement. Therefore, it is also crucial when considering investing in Microsoft. Every quarterly earnings report provides investors with an overview of sales, expenses, and net income for the most recent period. It also may provide a comparison to Microsoft's previous reporting period. The quarterly earnings reports are usually disseminated to the public via Form 10-Q, which is a legal document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission every quarter.
23rd of April 2024 Upcoming Quarterly Report | View | |
23rd of July 2024 Next Financial Report | View | |
31st of March 2024 Next Fiscal Quarter End | View | |
23rd of July 2024 Next Fiscal Year End | View | |
31st of December 2023 Last Quarter Report | View | |
30th of June 2023 Last Financial Announcement | View |
Microsoft Target Price Consensus
Microsoft target price is determined by taking all analyst projections and averaging them out. There is no one specific way to measure analysts' performance other than comparing it to past results via a very sophisticated attribution analysis. Microsoft's target price projections below should be used in combination with other traditional price prediction techniques such as stock price forecasting, investor sentiment analysis, technical analysis, earnings estimate, and various momentum models.
57 | Strong Buy |
Most Microsoft analysts issue ratings four times a year, at intervals of three months. Ratings are usually accompanied by a target price to help potential investors understand Microsoft stock's fair price compared to its market value. Analysts arrive at stock ratings after researching the public financial statements of Microsoft, talking to its executives and customers, or listening to those companies' conference calls.
Macroaxis Advice Exposure ValuationMicrosoft Target Price Projection
Microsoft's current and average target prices are 397.90 and 508.46, respectively. The current price of Microsoft is the price at which Microsoft is currently trading. On the other hand, Microsoft's target price is what analysts think the stock is worth or could sell for in the future. The more significant the discrepancy between the two prices, the more it stimulates investors to act.Current Price
Microsoft Market Quote on 25th of February 2025
Target Price
Analyst Consensus On Microsoft Target Price
Know Microsoft's Top Institutional Investors
Have you ever been surprised when a price of an equity instrument such as Microsoft is soaring high without any particular reason? This is usually happening because many institutional investors are aggressively trading Microsoft backward and forwards among themselves. Microsoft's institutional investor refers to the entity that pools money to purchase Microsoft's securities or originate loans. Institutional investors include commercial and private banks, credit unions, insurance companies, pension funds, hedge funds, endowments, and mutual funds. Operating companies that invest excess capital in these types of assets may also be included in the term and may influence corporate governance by exercising voting rights in their investments.
Shares | Capital Research Global Investors | 2024-12-31 | 75.2 M | Capital World Investors | 2024-12-31 | 68.3 M | Bank Of America Corp | 2024-12-31 | 68.1 M | Bank Of New York Mellon Corp | 2024-12-31 | 62.1 M | Ubs Asset Mgmt Americas Inc | 2024-12-31 | 60 M | Wellington Management Company Llp | 2024-12-31 | 53 M | Legal & General Group Plc | 2024-12-31 | 51.3 M | Nuveen Asset Management, Llc | 2024-09-30 | 51.2 M | Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc | 2024-12-31 | 49.1 M | Vanguard Group Inc | 2024-12-31 | 684.1 M | Blackrock Inc | 2024-12-31 | 576.2 M |
Follow Microsoft's market capitalization trends
The company currently falls under 'Mega-Cap' category with a current market capitalization of 3 T.Market Cap |
|
Project Microsoft's profitablity
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.28 | 0.22 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.33 | 0.36 | |
Return On Assets | 0.17 | 0.20 | |
Return On Equity | 0.30 | 0.24 |
When accessing Microsoft's net worth, it's important to look at multiple sources and consider different scenarios. For example, gross profit margin measures Microsoft's profitability after accounting for the cost of goods sold, while net profit margin measures profitability after accounting for all expenses. Other important metrics include return on assets, return on equity, and free cash flow. By reviewing multiple sources and metrics, you can gain a complete picture of Microsoft's profitability and make more informed investment decisions.
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Microsoft's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Microsoft. Check Microsoft's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Microsoft's management manipulating its earnings.
Evaluate Microsoft's management efficiency
Microsoft has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1465 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1465 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.3429 %, meaning that it created $0.3429 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Microsoft's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Microsoft manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Microsoft's Return On Capital Employed is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Return On Assets is likely to gain to 0.20 in 2025, whereas Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop 0.22 in 2025. At this time, Microsoft's Total Current Liabilities is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is likely to gain to about 618.4 B in 2025, whereas Non Current Liabilities Other is likely to drop slightly above 22.5 B in 2025.Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Book Value Per Share | 32.52 | 34.14 | |
Tangible Book Value Per Share | 14.73 | 15.47 | |
Enterprise Value Over EBITDA | 23.30 | 15.22 | |
Price Book Value Ratio | 11.38 | 6.62 | |
Enterprise Value Multiple | 23.30 | 15.22 | |
Price Fair Value | 11.38 | 6.62 | |
Enterprise Value | 1.9 T | 2 T |
The strategic decisions made by Microsoft management significantly impact its financial stability and market performance. Evaluating these factors helps determine whether the stock is a worthwhile investment.
Enterprise Value Revenue 11.4361 | Revenue | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.123 | Revenue Per Share | Return On Equity |
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Microsoft insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Microsoft's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases Microsoft insiders are required to file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Mason Mark over two weeks ago Acquisition by Mason Mark of 151 shares of Microsoft subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Hoffman Reid over three weeks ago Acquisition by Hoffman Reid of 225 shares of Microsoft subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Christopher Young over a year ago Payment of 10302 shares by Christopher Young of Microsoft subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Padmasree Warrior over a year ago Acquisition by Padmasree Warrior of 175 shares of Microsoft subject to Rule 16b-3 |
Microsoft Corporate Filings
F4 | 3rd of February 2025 The report filed by a party regarding the acquisition or disposition of a company's common stock, as well as derivative securities such as options, warrants, and convertible securities | ViewVerify |
8K | 29th of January 2025 Report filed with the SEC to announce major events that shareholders should know about | ViewVerify |
ASR | 12th of December 2024 Automatic Shelf Registration Statement under Rule 415 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) | ViewVerify |
8th of November 2024 Other Reports | ViewVerify |
Microsoft Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The calculation of Microsoft's earning per share is based on the data from the past 12 consecutive months, used for reporting the company's financial figures. The next projected EPS of Microsoft is estimated to be 3.2129 with the future projection ranging from a low of 3.16 to a high of 3.31. Please be aware that this consensus of annual earnings estimates for Microsoft is based on EPS before non-recurring items and includes expenses related to employee stock options.Last Reported EPS
3.16 Lowest | Expected EPS | 3.31 Highest |
Microsoft Earnings Projection Consensus
Suppose the current estimates of Microsoft's value are higher than the current market price of the Microsoft stock. In this case, investors may conclude that Microsoft is overpriced and will exhibit bullish sentiment. On the other hand, if the present value is lower than the stock price, analysts may conclude that the market undervalues the equity. These scenarios may suggest that the market is not as efficient as it should be at the estimation time, and Microsoft's stock will quickly adjusts to the new information provided by the consensus estimate.
Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of March 2025 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
57 | 95.32% | 3.23 | 3.2129 | 12.41 |
Microsoft Earnings History
Earnings estimate consensus by Microsoft analysts from Wall Street is used by the market to judge Microsoft's stock performance. Investors also use these earnings estimates to evaluate and project the stock performance into the future in order to make their investment decisions. However, we recommend analyzing not only Microsoft's upcoming profit reports and earnings-per-share forecasts but also comparing them to our different valuation methods.Microsoft Quarterly Gross Profit |
|
Microsoft Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual Earning per Share of Microsoft refers to what the company shows during its earnings calls or quarterly reports. The Expected EPS is what analysts covering Microsoft predict the company's earnings will be in the future. The higher the earnings per share of Microsoft, the better is its profitability. While calculating the Earning per Share, we use the weighted ratio, as the number of shares outstanding can change over time.Microsoft Estimated Months Earnings per Share
For an investor who is primarily interested in generating an income out of investing in entities such as Microsoft, the EPS ratio can tell if the company is intending to increase its current dividend. Although EPS is an essential tool for investors, it should not be used in isolation. EPS of Microsoft should always be considered in relation to other companies to make a more educated investment decision.Microsoft Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Earnings surprises can significantly impact Microsoft's stock price both in the short term and over time. Negative earnings surprises usually result in a price decline. However, it has been seen that positive earnings surprises lead to an immediate rise in a stock's price and a gradual increase over time. This is why we often hear news about some companies beating earning projections. Financial analysts spend a large amount of time predicting earnings per share (EPS) along with other important future indicators. Many analysts use forecasting models, management guidance, and additional fundamental information to derive an EPS estimate.
Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025-01-29 | 2024-12-31 | 3.1054 | 3.23 | 0.1246 | 4 | ||
2024-10-30 | 2024-09-30 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 0.2 | 6 | ||
2024-07-30 | 2024-06-30 | 2.93 | 2.95 | 0.02 | 0 | ||
2024-04-25 | 2024-03-31 | 2.82 | 2.94 | 0.12 | 4 | ||
2024-01-30 | 2023-12-31 | 2.78 | 2.93 | 0.15 | 5 | ||
2023-10-24 | 2023-09-30 | 2.65 | 2.99 | 0.34 | 12 | ||
2023-07-25 | 2023-06-30 | 2.55 | 2.69 | 0.14 | 5 | ||
2023-04-25 | 2023-03-31 | 2.23 | 2.45 | 0.22 | 9 | ||
2023-01-24 | 2022-12-31 | 2.29 | 2.32 | 0.03 | 1 | ||
2022-10-25 | 2022-09-30 | 2.3 | 2.35 | 0.05 | 2 | ||
2022-07-26 | 2022-06-30 | 2.29 | 2.23 | -0.06 | 2 | ||
2022-04-26 | 2022-03-31 | 2.19 | 2.22 | 0.03 | 1 | ||
2022-01-25 | 2021-12-31 | 2.31 | 2.48 | 0.17 | 7 | ||
2021-10-26 | 2021-09-30 | 2.07 | 2.27 | 0.2 | 9 | ||
2021-07-27 | 2021-06-30 | 1.92 | 2.17 | 0.25 | 13 | ||
2021-04-27 | 2021-03-31 | 1.78 | 1.95 | 0.17 | 9 | ||
2021-01-26 | 2020-12-31 | 1.64 | 2.03 | 0.39 | 23 | ||
2020-10-27 | 2020-09-30 | 1.54 | 1.82 | 0.28 | 18 | ||
2020-07-22 | 2020-06-30 | 1.34 | 1.46 | 0.12 | 8 | ||
2020-04-29 | 2020-03-31 | 1.26 | 1.4 | 0.14 | 11 | ||
2020-01-29 | 2019-12-31 | 1.32 | 1.51 | 0.19 | 14 | ||
2019-10-23 | 2019-09-30 | 1.25 | 1.38 | 0.13 | 10 | ||
2019-07-18 | 2019-06-30 | 1.21 | 1.37 | 0.16 | 13 | ||
2019-04-24 | 2019-03-31 | 1 | 1.14 | 0.14 | 14 | ||
2019-01-30 | 2018-12-31 | 1.09 | 1.1 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2018-10-24 | 2018-09-30 | 0.96 | 1.14 | 0.18 | 18 | ||
2018-07-19 | 2018-06-30 | 1.08 | 1.13 | 0.05 | 4 | ||
2018-04-26 | 2018-03-31 | 0.85 | 0.95 | 0.1 | 11 | ||
2018-01-31 | 2017-12-31 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.1 | 11 | ||
2017-10-26 | 2017-09-30 | 0.72 | 0.84 | 0.12 | 16 | ||
2017-07-20 | 2017-06-30 | 0.71 | 0.98 | 0.27 | 38 | ||
2017-04-27 | 2017-03-31 | 0.7 | 0.73 | 0.03 | 4 | ||
2017-01-26 | 2016-12-31 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.05 | 6 | ||
2016-10-20 | 2016-09-30 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.08 | 11 | ||
2016-07-19 | 2016-06-30 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.11 | 18 | ||
2016-04-21 | 2016-03-31 | 0.64 | 0.62 | -0.02 | 3 | ||
2016-01-28 | 2015-12-31 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.07 | 9 | ||
2015-10-22 | 2015-09-30 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.08 | 13 | ||
2015-07-21 | 2015-06-30 | 0.56 | 0.6 | 0.04 | 7 | ||
2015-04-23 | 2015-03-31 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.1 | 19 | ||
2015-01-26 | 2014-12-31 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.04 | 5 | ||
2014-10-23 | 2014-09-30 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 0.05 | 10 | ||
2014-07-22 | 2014-06-30 | 0.6 | 0.55 | -0.05 | 8 | ||
2014-04-24 | 2014-03-31 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.05 | 7 | ||
2014-01-23 | 2013-12-31 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.1 | 14 | ||
2013-10-24 | 2013-09-30 | 0.54 | 0.62 | 0.08 | 14 | ||
2013-07-18 | 2013-06-30 | 0.75 | 0.66 | -0.09 | 12 | ||
2013-04-18 | 2013-03-31 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.04 | 5 | ||
2013-01-24 | 2012-12-31 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2012-10-18 | 2012-09-30 | 0.56 | 0.53 | -0.03 | 5 | ||
2012-07-19 | 2012-06-30 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.05 | 8 | ||
2012-04-19 | 2012-03-31 | 0.57 | 0.6 | 0.03 | 5 | ||
2012-01-19 | 2011-12-31 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2011-10-20 | 2011-09-30 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2011-07-21 | 2011-06-30 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.11 | 18 | ||
2011-04-28 | 2011-03-31 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.05 | 8 | ||
2011-01-27 | 2010-12-31 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.09 | 13 | ||
2010-10-28 | 2010-09-30 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.07 | 12 | ||
2010-07-22 | 2010-06-30 | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.05 | 10 | ||
2010-04-22 | 2010-03-31 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 0.03 | 7 | ||
2010-01-28 | 2009-12-31 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 0.15 | 25 | ||
2009-10-23 | 2009-09-30 | 0.32 | 0.4 | 0.08 | 25 | ||
2009-07-23 | 2009-06-30 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2009-04-23 | 2009-03-31 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2009-01-22 | 2008-12-31 | 0.49 | 0.47 | -0.02 | 4 | ||
2008-10-23 | 2008-09-30 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2008-07-17 | 2008-06-30 | 0.47 | 0.46 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2008-04-24 | 2008-03-31 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.03 | 6 | ||
2008-01-24 | 2007-12-31 | 0.46 | 0.5 | 0.04 | 8 | ||
2007-10-25 | 2007-09-30 | 0.39 | 0.45 | 0.06 | 15 | ||
2007-07-19 | 2007-06-30 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-04-26 | 2007-03-31 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.03 | 6 | ||
2007-01-25 | 2006-12-31 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.03 | 13 | ||
2006-10-26 | 2006-09-30 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 12 | ||
2006-07-20 | 2006-06-30 | 0.3 | 0.31 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2006-04-27 | 2006-03-31 | 0.33 | 0.32 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
2006-01-26 | 2005-12-31 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2005-10-27 | 2005-09-30 | 0.3 | 0.31 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2005-07-21 | 2005-06-30 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2005-04-28 | 2005-03-31 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2005-01-27 | 2004-12-31 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.02 | 6 | ||
2004-10-21 | 2004-09-30 | 0.3 | 0.31 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2004-07-22 | 2004-06-30 | 0.29 | 0.28 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
2004-04-22 | 2004-03-31 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.05 | 17 | ||
2004-01-22 | 2003-12-31 | 0.3 | 0.34 | 0.04 | 13 | ||
2003-10-23 | 2003-09-30 | 0.29 | 0.3 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2003-07-17 | 2003-06-30 | 0.24 | 0.23 | -0.01 | 4 | ||
2003-04-15 | 2003-03-31 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 12 | ||
2003-01-16 | 2002-12-31 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 17 | ||
2002-10-17 | 2002-09-30 | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.07 | 33 | ||
2002-07-18 | 2002-06-30 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-04-18 | 2002-03-31 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-01-17 | 2001-12-31 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.04 | 19 | ||
2001-10-18 | 2001-09-30 | 0.2 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 10 | ||
2001-07-19 | 2001-06-30 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2001-04-19 | 2001-03-31 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2001-01-18 | 2000-12-31 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2000-10-18 | 2000-09-30 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 9 | ||
2000-07-18 | 2000-06-30 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2000-04-20 | 2000-03-31 | 0.2 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 10 | ||
2000-01-18 | 1999-12-31 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.03 | 14 | ||
1999-10-19 | 1999-09-30 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.02 | 11 | ||
1999-07-19 | 1999-06-30 | 0.18 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 11 | ||
1999-04-20 | 1999-03-31 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.03 | 18 | ||
1999-01-19 | 1998-12-31 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 20 | ||
1998-10-20 | 1998-09-30 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 16 | ||
1998-07-16 | 1998-06-30 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 8 | ||
1998-04-22 | 1998-03-31 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 8 | ||
1998-01-21 | 1997-12-31 | 0.1 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 10 | ||
1997-10-20 | 1997-09-30 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-07-17 | 1997-06-30 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-04-17 | 1997-03-31 | 0.08 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 25 | ||
1997-01-17 | 1996-12-31 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 16 | ||
1996-10-21 | 1996-09-30 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-07-22 | 1996-06-30 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-04-18 | 1996-03-31 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 20 |
Microsoft Corporate Management
Hossein Nowbar | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Brett Iversen | Vice Relations | Profile | |
Christopher Young | Strategy Development | Profile | |
Takeshi Numoto | Executive Officer | Profile |
Additional Tools for Microsoft Stock Analysis
When running Microsoft's price analysis, check to measure Microsoft's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Microsoft is operating at the current time. Most of Microsoft's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Microsoft's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Microsoft's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Microsoft to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.