W R Net Worth
W R Net Worth Breakdown | WRB |
W R Net Worth Analysis
W R's net worth analysis, or its valuation, is the process of determining the total value of the company. This involves assessing a range of factors, including W R's financial performance, assets, liabilities, and potential for growth. The ultimate goal is to provide a clear understanding of W R's overall worth, which can help investors make informed investment decisions. There are several methods that can be used to perform W R's net worth analysis. One common approach is to calculate W R's market capitalization.Another approach is to use the price-to-earnings ratio (P/E ratio), which compares W R's stock price to its earnings per share (EPS). Discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis is another popular method for assessing W R's net worth. This approach calculates the present value of W R's future cash flows, taking into account factors such as growth rate, profitability, and risk. By comparing the present value of W R's cash flows to its current stock price, investors can gain a better understanding of the company's overall value. Finally, investors may use comparable company analysis to evaluate W R's net worth. This involves comparing W R's financial metrics to similar companies in the same industry. By identifying companies with similar financial characteristics, investors can gain insight into W R's net worth relative to its peers.
Enterprise Value |
|
To determine if W R is a good investment, evaluating the company's potential for future growth is also very important. This may include expanding into new markets, launching new products or services, or improving operational efficiency. Companies with strong growth prospects can be more attractive investments. This aspect of the research should be conducted in the context of the overall market and industry in which the company operates and should include an analysis of growth potential, competitive landscape, and any regulatory or economic factors that could impact the business. Some of the essential points regarding W R's net worth research are outlined below:
| W R Berkley has 2.84 B in debt with debt to equity (D/E) ratio of 0.48, which is OK given its current industry classification. W R Berkley has a current ratio of 0.41, suggesting that it has not enough short term capital to pay financial commitments when the payables are due. Note however, debt could still be an excellent tool for WRB to invest in growth at high rates of return. | |
| About 69.0% of W R outstanding shares are owned by institutional investors | |
| On 12th of March 2025 W R paid $ 0.08 per share dividend to its current shareholders | |
| Latest headline from finance.yahoo.com: W. R. Berkley Corporation Among the Most Undervalued Insurance Stocks to Buy Now |
W R Quarterly Good Will |
|
W R uses earnings reports to provide investors with an update of all three financial statements, including the income statement, the balance sheet, and the cash flow statement. Therefore, it is also crucial when considering investing in W R Berkley. Every quarterly earnings report provides investors with an overview of sales, expenses, and net income for the most recent period. It also may provide a comparison to W R's previous reporting period. The quarterly earnings reports are usually disseminated to the public via Form 10-Q, which is a legal document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission every quarter.
| 18th of April 2024 Upcoming Quarterly Report | View | |
| 18th of July 2024 Next Financial Report | View | |
| 31st of March 2024 Next Fiscal Quarter End | View | |
| 22nd of January 2025 Next Fiscal Year End | View | |
| 31st of December 2023 Last Quarter Report | View | |
| 31st of December 2023 Last Financial Announcement | View |
W R Target Price Consensus
WRB target price is determined by taking all analyst projections and averaging them out. There is no one specific way to measure analysts' performance other than comparing it to past results via a very sophisticated attribution analysis. W R's target price projections below should be used in combination with other traditional price prediction techniques such as stock price forecasting, investor sentiment analysis, technical analysis, earnings estimate, and various momentum models.
| 16 | Buy |
Most WRB analysts issue ratings four times a year, at intervals of three months. Ratings are usually accompanied by a target price to help potential investors understand WRB stock's fair price compared to its market value. Analysts arrive at stock ratings after researching the public financial statements of W R Berkley, talking to its executives and customers, or listening to those companies' conference calls.
Macroaxis Advice Exposure ValuationW R Target Price Projection
W R's current and average target prices are 64.08 and 64.00, respectively. The current price of W R is the price at which W R Berkley is currently trading. On the other hand, W R's target price is what analysts think the stock is worth or could sell for in the future. The more significant the discrepancy between the two prices, the more it stimulates investors to act.Target Price
Analyst Consensus On W R Target Price
Know W R's Top Institutional Investors
Have you ever been surprised when a price of an equity instrument such as W R is soaring high without any particular reason? This is usually happening because many institutional investors are aggressively trading W R Berkley backward and forwards among themselves. W R's institutional investor refers to the entity that pools money to purchase W R's securities or originate loans. Institutional investors include commercial and private banks, credit unions, insurance companies, pension funds, hedge funds, endowments, and mutual funds. Operating companies that invest excess capital in these types of assets may also be included in the term and may influence corporate governance by exercising voting rights in their investments.
| Shares | Principal Financial Group Inc | 2024-12-31 | 4.1 M | Northern Trust Corp | 2024-12-31 | 3.3 M | Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc. | 2024-12-31 | 3.1 M | Bank Of America Corp | 2024-12-31 | 2.9 M | Polar Capital Holdings Plc | 2024-12-31 | 2.9 M | Wells Fargo & Co | 2024-12-31 | 2.9 M | 1832 Asset Management L.p | 2024-12-31 | 2.8 M | Ubs Asset Mgmt Americas Inc | 2024-12-31 | 2.5 M | Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 2024-12-31 | 2.1 M | Vanguard Group Inc | 2024-12-31 | 36.4 M | Blackrock Inc | 2024-12-31 | 24.4 M |
Follow W R's market capitalization trends
The company currently falls under 'Large-Cap' category with a total capitalization of 23.98 B.Market Cap |
|
Project W R's profitablity
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | 0.15 | 0.16 | |
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.10 | 0.12 | |
| Return On Assets | 0.15 | 0.16 | |
| Return On Equity | 0.21 | 0.22 |
When accessing W R's net worth, it's important to look at multiple sources and consider different scenarios. For example, gross profit margin measures W R's profitability after accounting for the cost of goods sold, while net profit margin measures profitability after accounting for all expenses. Other important metrics include return on assets, return on equity, and free cash flow. By reviewing multiple sources and metrics, you can gain a complete picture of W R's profitability and make more informed investment decisions.
Please note, the presentation of W R's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, W R's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of W R's management manipulating its earnings.
Evaluate W R's management efficiency
W R Berkley has Return on Asset of 0.0376 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0376 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.221 %, implying that it generated $0.221 on every 100 dollars invested. W R's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well W R manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. The current year's Return On Tangible Assets is expected to grow to 0.16. The current year's Return On Capital Employed is expected to grow to 0.12. At present, W R's Total Assets are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Other Assets is expected to grow to about 11.7 B, whereas Non Current Assets Total are forecasted to decline to about 8.9 M.| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Book Value Per Share | (50.94) | (48.39) | |
| Tangible Book Value Per Share | (51.40) | (48.83) | |
| Enterprise Value Over EBITDA | 11.88 | 12.47 | |
| Price Book Value Ratio | 2.82 | 2.96 | |
| Enterprise Value Multiple | 11.88 | 12.47 | |
| Price Fair Value | 2.82 | 2.96 | |
| Enterprise Value | 26.4 B | 27.7 B |
The strategic initiatives led by W R's management are central to its market success. By analyzing these initiatives, we provide a clear picture of the stock's growth prospects.
Enterprise Value Revenue 1.82 | Revenue | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.139 | Revenue Per Share | Return On Equity |
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific W R insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on W R's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases W R insiders are required to file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Jonathan Talisman over six months ago Acquisition by Jonathan Talisman of 681 shares of W R subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Richard Baio over a year ago Disposition of 202 shares by Richard Baio of W R at 74.345 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
James Shiel over a year ago Acquisition by James Shiel of 13084 shares of W R subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
James Shiel over a year ago Acquisition by James Shiel of 25345 shares of W R subject to Rule 16b-3 |
W R Corporate Filings
10K | 24th of February 2025 Annual report required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of a company financial performance | ViewVerify |
| 14th of February 2025 Other Reports | ViewVerify | |
| 30th of January 2025 Other Reports | ViewVerify | |
8K | 27th of January 2025 Report filed with the SEC to announce major events that shareholders should know about | ViewVerify |
W R Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The calculation of W R's earning per share is based on the data from the past 12 consecutive months, used for reporting the company's financial figures. The next projected EPS of W R is estimated to be 1.0714 with the future projection ranging from a low of 1.03 to a high of 1.14. Please be aware that this consensus of annual earnings estimates for W R Berkley is based on EPS before non-recurring items and includes expenses related to employee stock options.Last Reported EPS
1.03 Lowest | Expected EPS | 1.14 Highest |
W R Earnings Projection Consensus
Suppose the current estimates of W R's value are higher than the current market price of the W R stock. In this case, investors may conclude that W R is overpriced and will exhibit bullish sentiment. On the other hand, if the present value is lower than the stock price, analysts may conclude that the market undervalues the equity. These scenarios may suggest that the market is not as efficient as it should be at the estimation time, and W R's stock will quickly adjusts to the new information provided by the consensus estimate.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of March 2025 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 17 | 89.01% | 1.13 | 1.0714 | 4.36 |
W R Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual Earning per Share of W R refers to what the company shows during its earnings calls or quarterly reports. The Expected EPS is what analysts covering W R Berkley predict the company's earnings will be in the future. The higher the earnings per share of W R, the better is its profitability. While calculating the Earning per Share, we use the weighted ratio, as the number of shares outstanding can change over time.W R Estimated Months Earnings per Share
For an investor who is primarily interested in generating an income out of investing in entities such as W R, the EPS ratio can tell if the company is intending to increase its current dividend. Although EPS is an essential tool for investors, it should not be used in isolation. EPS of W R should always be considered in relation to other companies to make a more educated investment decision.WRB Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Earnings surprises can significantly impact W R's stock price both in the short term and over time. Negative earnings surprises usually result in a price decline. However, it has been seen that positive earnings surprises lead to an immediate rise in a stock's price and a gradual increase over time. This is why we often hear news about some companies beating earning projections. Financial analysts spend a large amount of time predicting earnings per share (EPS) along with other important future indicators. Many analysts use forecasting models, management guidance, and additional fundamental information to derive an EPS estimate.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025-01-22 | 2024-12-31 | 0.99 | 1.13 | 0.14 | 14 | ||
2024-10-21 | 2024-09-30 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2024-07-22 | 2024-06-30 | 0.92 | 1.04 | 0.12 | 13 | ||
2024-04-23 | 2024-03-31 | 1.44 | 1.56 | 0.12 | 8 | ||
2024-01-24 | 2023-12-31 | 1.38 | 1.45 | 0.07 | 5 | ||
2023-10-23 | 2023-09-30 | 1.18 | 1.35 | 0.17 | 14 | ||
2023-07-20 | 2023-06-30 | 1.1 | 1.14 | 0.04 | 3 | ||
2023-04-20 | 2023-03-31 | 1.23 | 1.0 | -0.23 | 18 | ||
2023-01-26 | 2022-12-31 | 1.1 | 1.16 | 0.06 | 5 | ||
2022-10-24 | 2022-09-30 | 0.85 | 1.01 | 0.16 | 18 | ||
2022-07-21 | 2022-06-30 | 0.86 | 1.12 | 0.26 | 30 | ||
2022-04-25 | 2022-03-31 | 0.95 | 1.1 | 0.15 | 15 | ||
2022-01-27 | 2021-12-31 | 0.84 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 21 | ||
2021-10-21 | 2021-09-30 | 0.66 | 0.88 | 0.22 | 33 | ||
2021-07-22 | 2021-06-30 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.11 | 16 | ||
2021-04-20 | 2021-03-31 | 0.54 | 0.72 | 0.18 | 33 | ||
2021-01-26 | 2020-12-31 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.08 | 15 | ||
2020-10-20 | 2020-09-30 | 0.45 | 0.43 | -0.02 | 4 | ||
2020-07-21 | 2020-06-30 | 0.17 | 0.04 | -0.13 | 76 | ||
2020-04-21 | 2020-03-31 | 0.49 | 0.61 | 0.12 | 24 | ||
2020-01-28 | 2019-12-31 | 0.48 | 0.47 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2019-10-22 | 2019-09-30 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.12 | 26 | ||
2019-07-23 | 2019-06-30 | 0.42 | 0.55 | 0.13 | 30 | ||
2019-04-23 | 2019-03-31 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2019-01-29 | 2018-12-31 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.07 | 20 | ||
2018-10-23 | 2018-09-30 | 0.38 | 0.5 | 0.12 | 31 | ||
2018-07-24 | 2018-06-30 | 0.37 | 0.43 | 0.06 | 16 | ||
2018-04-24 | 2018-03-31 | 0.4 | 0.44 | 0.04 | 10 | ||
2018-01-30 | 2017-12-31 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2017-10-24 | 2017-09-30 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 15 | ||
2017-07-25 | 2017-06-30 | 0.34 | 0.28 | -0.06 | 17 | ||
2017-04-24 | 2017-03-31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2017-01-31 | 2016-12-31 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2016-10-25 | 2016-09-30 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2016-07-25 | 2016-06-30 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
2016-04-26 | 2016-03-31 | 0.38 | 0.4 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
2016-02-02 | 2015-12-31 | 0.36 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2015-10-26 | 2015-09-30 | 0.37 | 0.4 | 0.03 | 8 | ||
2015-07-27 | 2015-06-30 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2015-04-27 | 2015-03-31 | 0.33 | 0.36 | 0.03 | 9 | ||
2015-02-03 | 2014-12-31 | 0.36 | 0.32 | -0.04 | 11 | ||
2014-10-23 | 2014-09-30 | 0.4 | 0.47 | 0.07 | 17 | ||
2014-07-28 | 2014-06-30 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
2014-04-22 | 2014-03-31 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 0.09 | 25 | ||
2014-01-28 | 2013-12-31 | 0.34 | 0.38 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2013-10-21 | 2013-09-30 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2013-07-22 | 2013-06-30 | 0.3 | 0.31 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2013-04-23 | 2013-03-31 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2013-01-28 | 2012-12-31 | 0.22 | 0.28 | 0.06 | 27 | ||
2012-10-22 | 2012-09-30 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 8 | ||
2012-07-24 | 2012-06-30 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.02 | 7 | ||
2012-04-23 | 2012-03-31 | 0.3 | 0.32 | 0.02 | 6 | ||
2012-01-31 | 2011-12-31 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.02 | 9 | ||
2011-10-26 | 2011-09-30 | 0.17 | 0.2 | 0.03 | 17 | ||
2011-07-25 | 2011-06-30 | 0.19 | 0.2 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
2011-04-25 | 2011-03-31 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2011-02-02 | 2010-12-31 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2010-10-25 | 2010-09-30 | 0.29 | 0.3 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2010-07-26 | 2010-06-30 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2010-04-26 | 2010-03-31 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 10 | ||
2010-02-08 | 2009-12-31 | 0.3 | 0.32 | 0.02 | 6 | ||
2009-10-26 | 2009-09-30 | 0.29 | 0.3 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2009-07-27 | 2009-06-30 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2009-04-27 | 2009-03-31 | 0.16 | 0.11 | -0.05 | 31 | ||
2009-02-09 | 2008-12-31 | 0.35 | 0.28 | -0.07 | 20 | ||
2008-10-28 | 2008-09-30 | 0.33 | 0.32 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
2008-07-23 | 2008-06-30 | 0.37 | 0.34 | -0.03 | 8 | ||
2008-04-24 | 2008-03-31 | 0.41 | 0.37 | -0.04 | 9 | ||
2008-02-11 | 2007-12-31 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2007-10-22 | 2007-09-30 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-07-23 | 2007-06-30 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-04-23 | 2007-03-31 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-02-08 | 2006-12-31 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.04 | 10 | ||
2006-10-25 | 2006-09-30 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2006-07-25 | 2006-06-30 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2006-04-24 | 2006-03-31 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2006-02-13 | 2005-12-31 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.05 | 16 | ||
2005-10-24 | 2005-09-30 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.02 | 8 | ||
2005-07-25 | 2005-06-30 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2005-04-26 | 2005-03-31 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2005-02-14 | 2004-12-31 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2004-10-26 | 2004-09-30 | 0.2 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
2004-07-26 | 2004-06-30 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2004-04-27 | 2004-03-31 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2004-02-11 | 2003-12-31 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
2003-10-27 | 2003-09-30 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 6 | ||
2003-07-23 | 2003-06-30 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 7 | ||
2003-04-25 | 2003-03-31 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 7 | ||
2003-02-10 | 2002-12-31 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 8 | ||
2002-10-29 | 2002-09-30 | 0.1 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 10 | ||
2002-07-24 | 2002-06-30 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 12 | ||
2002-04-29 | 2002-03-31 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 14 | ||
2002-02-14 | 2001-12-31 | -0.14 | -0.18 | -0.04 | 28 | ||
2001-10-25 | 2001-09-30 | 0.03 | -0.04 | -0.07 | 233 | ||
2001-07-26 | 2001-06-30 | 0.03 | 0.02 | -0.01 | 33 | ||
2001-04-26 | 2001-03-31 | 0.04 | 0.03 | -0.01 | 25 | ||
2001-02-05 | 2000-12-31 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2000-10-31 | 2000-09-30 | 0.03 | 0.02 | -0.01 | 33 | ||
2000-07-31 | 2000-06-30 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2000-04-26 | 2000-03-31 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2000-03-13 | 1999-12-31 | -0.12 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 208 | ||
1999-10-22 | 1999-09-30 | 0.02 | -0.0032 | -0.0232 | 116 | ||
1999-07-29 | 1999-06-30 | 0.04 | 0.02 | -0.02 | 50 | ||
1999-04-29 | 1999-03-31 | 0.04 | 0.03 | -0.01 | 25 | ||
1999-02-25 | 1998-12-31 | 0.04 | -0.04 | -0.08 | 200 | ||
1998-10-29 | 1998-09-30 | 0.04 | 0.03 | -0.01 | 25 | ||
1998-08-03 | 1998-06-30 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1998-04-27 | 1998-03-31 | 0.1 | 0.09 | -0.01 | 10 | ||
1998-02-25 | 1997-12-31 | 0.1 | 0.09 | -0.01 | 10 | ||
1997-10-27 | 1997-09-30 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-07-29 | 1997-06-30 | 0.09 | 0.08 | -0.01 | 11 | ||
1997-05-09 | 1997-03-31 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-02-26 | 1996-12-31 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-10-30 | 1996-09-30 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-08-05 | 1996-06-30 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-04-30 | 1996-03-31 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-02-21 | 1995-12-31 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1995-10-29 | 1995-09-30 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 0 |
W R Corporate Directors
| Maria Ferre | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Mark Brockbank | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Jack Nusbaum | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Christopher Augostini | Independent Director | Profile |
Already Invested in W R Berkley?
The danger of trading W R Berkley is mainly related to its market volatility and Company specific events. As an investor, you must understand the concept of risk-adjusted return before you start trading. The most common way to measure the risk of W R is by using the Sharpe ratio. The ratio expresses how much excess return you acquire for the extra volatility you endure for holding a more risker asset than W R. The Sharpe ratio is calculated by using standard deviation and excess return to determine reward per unit of risk. To understand how volatile W R Berkley is, you must compare it to a benchmark. Traditionally, the risk-free rate of return is the rate of return on the shortest-dated U.S. Treasury, such as a 3-year bond.
When determining whether W R Berkley offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of W R's financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of W R Berkley Stock. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on W R Berkley Stock: Check out Your Current Watchlist to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in W R Berkley. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in metropolitan statistical area. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.
Is Property & Casualty Insurance space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of W R. If investors know WRB will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about W R listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.471 | Dividend Share 0.31 | Earnings Share 4.36 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.139 |
The market value of W R Berkley is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of WRB that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of W R's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is W R's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because W R's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect W R's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between W R's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if W R is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, W R's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.