Public Service Enterprise Stock Beneish M Score

PEG Stock  USD 83.30  0.17  0.20%   
This module uses fundamental data of Public Service to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. Public Service M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out Public Service Piotroski F Score and Public Service Altman Z Score analysis.
  
At this time, Public Service's Long Term Debt To Capitalization is most likely to increase slightly in the upcoming years. The Public Service's current Total Debt To Capitalization is estimated to increase to 0.62, while Net Debt is projected to decrease to roughly 12.5 B. At this time, Public Service's Book Value Per Share is most likely to increase significantly in the upcoming years. The Public Service's current EV To Sales is estimated to increase to 6.62, while Days Sales Outstanding is projected to decrease to 49.26.
At this time, Public Service's M Score is unavailable. The earnings manipulation may begin if Public Service's top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by Public Service executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of Public Service's earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
-2.12
Beneish M Score - Unavailable
Elasticity of Receivables

1.03

Focus
Asset Quality

1.46

Focus
Expense Coverage

1.04

Focus
Gross Margin Strengs

1.51

Focus
Accruals Factor

1.04

Focus
Depreciation Resistance

0.55

Focus
Net Sales Growth

0.92

Focus
Financial Leverage Condition

0.87

Focus

Public Service Beneish M-Score Indicator Trends

The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if Public Service's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Net Receivables1.8 B1.9 B
Notably Down
Slightly volatile
Total Revenue9.4 B10.3 B
Significantly Down
Slightly volatile
Total Assets35.7 B54.6 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Current Assets3.8 B4.2 B
Fairly Down
Slightly volatile
Non Current Assets Total31.9 B50.4 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Property Plant Equipment23.5 B41.5 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Current Liabilities4.2 B6.5 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Non Current Liabilities Total20.5 B32 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Net Debt12.5 B22.8 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Short Term DebtB3.8 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Long Term Debt12 B20.5 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Cash From Operating Activities2.4 B2.1 B
Moderately Up
Pretty Stable
Long Term Investments2.8 B2.7 B
Sufficiently Up
Pretty Stable
Gross Profit Margin0.520.3441
Way Up
Slightly volatile

Public Service Enterprise Beneish M-Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between Public Service's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Public Service in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find Public Service's degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.

About Public Service Beneish M Score

M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.

Operating Income

2.13 Billion

At this time, Public Service's Operating Income is most likely to decrease significantly in the upcoming years.

Public Service Earnings Manipulation Drivers

Although earnings manipulation is typically not the result of intentional misconduct by the c-level executives, it is still a widespread practice by the senior management of public companies such as Public Service. It is usually done by a series of misrepresentations of various accounting rules and operating activities across multiple financial cycles. The best way to spot the manipulation is to examine the historical financial statement to find inconsistencies in earning reports to find trends in assets or liabilities that are not sustainable in the future.
202020212022202320242025 (projected)
Net Receivables1.7B2.1B2.3B1.7B1.9B1.8B
Total Revenue9.6B9.7B9.8B11.2B10.3B9.4B
Total Assets50.1B49.0B48.7B50.7B54.6B35.7B
Total Current Assets3.6B6.3B4.3B3.4B4.2B3.8B
Net Debt17.0B18.8B20.0B20.4B22.8B12.5B
Short Term Debt2.7B4.2B3.8B2.4B3.8B2.0B
Long Term Debt14.5B15.2B16.5B17.8B20.5B12.0B
Operating Income2.3B(856M)1.4B3.7B2.4B2.1B
Investments(16M)(103M)(149M)(2.8B)(3.3B)(3.1B)

Public Service ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Public Service's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Public Service's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environment Score
Governance Score
Social Score

About Public Service Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Public Service Enterprise's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Public Service using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Public Service Enterprise based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis

When determining whether Public Service Enterprise is a strong investment it is important to analyze Public Service's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Public Service's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Public Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Check out Public Service Piotroski F Score and Public Service Altman Z Score analysis.
You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.
Is Multi-Utilities space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Public Service. If investors know Public will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Public Service listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
(0.48)
Dividend Share
2.4
Earnings Share
3.54
Revenue Per Share
20.663
Quarterly Revenue Growth
(0.05)
The market value of Public Service Enterprise is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Public that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Public Service's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Public Service's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Public Service's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Public Service's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Public Service's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Public Service is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Public Service's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.