Full House Resorts Stock Z Score

FLL Stock

USD 4.02 0.01 0.25%

Altman Z Score is one of the simplest fundamental models to determine how likely your company is to fail. The module uses available fundamental data of a given equity to approximate the Altman Z score. Altman Z Score is determined by evaluating five fundamental price points available from the company's current public disclosure documents. Check out Full House Piotroski F Score and Full House Valuation analysis.

At this time, Full House's Capital Lease Obligations is quite stable compared to the past year. Change In Working Capital is expected to rise to about 5.5 M this year, although the value of Net Invested Capital will most likely fall to about 356.6 M. At this time, Full House's Cost Of Revenue is quite stable compared to the past year. Total Operating Expenses is expected to rise to about 109.3 M this year, although the value of EBIT is projected to rise to (79.5 M).

Full House Resorts Company Z Score Analysis

Full House's Z-Score is a simple linear, multi-factor model that measures the financial health and economic stability of a company. The score is used to predict the probability of a firm going into bankruptcy within next 24 months or two fiscal years from the day stated on the accounting statements used to calculate it. The model uses five fundamental business ratios that are weighted according to algorithm of Professor Edward Altman who developed it in the late 1960s at New York University..

Z Score

Sum Of

5 Factors

More About Z Score | All Equity Analysis

First Factor

1.2 * (

Working Capital

/

Total Assets )

Second Factor

1.4 * (

Retained Earnings

/

Total Assets )

Thrid Factor

3.3 * (

EBITAD

/

Total Assets )

Fouth Factor

0.6 * (

Market Value of Equity

/

Total Liabilities )

Fifth Factor

0.99 * (

Revenue

/

Total Assets )

Full Z Score Driver Correlations

Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Full House is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Full Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Z Score. Since Full House's main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Full House's historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Full House's interrelated accounts and indicators.

	Total Assets	Total Stockholder Equity	Net Debt	Accounts Payable	Net Receivables	Total Liab	Total Current Assets	Retained Earnings	Short Term Debt	Good Will	Intangible Assets	Long Term Debt	Common Stock	Property Plant Equipment	Current Deferred Revenue	Treasury Stock	Net Tangible Assets	Long Term Debt Total	Capital Surpluse	Deferred Long Term Liab	Short Long Term Debt	Net Invested Capital	Net Working Capital	Long Term Investments	Capital Stock
Total Assets		0.7	0.57	0.86	0.58	0.63	0.51	-0.78	0.67	0.32	0.8	1.0	0.79	0.97	0.73	0.9	0.32	0.99	0.86	0.3	-0.48	0.94	0.26	-0.61	0.94
Total Stockholder Equity	0.7		-0.19	0.54	0.3	-0.12	0.0	-0.83	0.99	-0.02	0.87	0.72	0.38	0.77	0.76	0.44	0.07	0.75	0.45	0.15	-0.29	0.52	-0.17	-0.94	0.7
Net Debt	0.57	-0.19		0.55	0.43	0.99	0.65	-0.12	-0.22	0.44	0.12	0.54	0.62	0.46	0.14	0.73	0.37	0.5	0.65	0.24	-0.3	0.69	0.49	0.25	0.47
Accounts Payable	0.86	0.54	0.55		0.53	0.6	0.36	-0.71	0.52	0.46	0.75	0.85	0.73	0.8	0.78	0.68	0.21	0.82	0.74	0.5	-0.39	0.76	0.13	-0.47	0.75
Net Receivables	0.58	0.3	0.43	0.53		0.48	0.43	-0.38	0.29	0.25	0.41	0.55	0.68	0.51	0.39	0.52	0.17	0.53	0.61	-0.08	-0.45	0.6	0.27	-0.17	0.58
Total Liab	0.63	-0.12	0.99	0.6	0.48		0.71	-0.18	-0.15	0.46	0.17	0.61	0.67	0.52	0.18	0.77	0.37	0.57	0.7	0.26	-0.35	0.73	0.54	0.18	0.53
Total Current Assets	0.51	0.0	0.65	0.36	0.43	0.71		-0.05	-0.07	0.34	-0.03	0.49	0.64	0.35	-0.04	0.64	0.42	0.5	0.68	0.17	-0.34	0.63	0.96	0.1	0.57
Retained Earnings	-0.78	-0.83	-0.12	-0.71	-0.38	-0.18	-0.05		-0.86	0.03	-0.85	-0.81	-0.54	-0.84	-0.82	-0.65	0.21	-0.82	-0.63	-0.33	0.39	-0.67	0.16	0.79	-0.76
Short Term Debt	0.67	0.99	-0.22	0.52	0.29	-0.15	-0.07	-0.86		-0.09	0.87	0.69	0.34	0.74	0.77	0.42	-0.02	0.71	0.42	0.14	-0.24	0.49	-0.24	-0.95	0.67
Good Will	0.32	-0.02	0.44	0.46	0.25	0.46	0.34	0.03	-0.09		0.06	0.27	0.56	0.3	0.09	0.15	0.38	0.26	0.39	0.51	-0.17	0.25	0.24	0.15	0.19
Intangible Assets	0.8	0.87	0.12	0.75	0.41	0.17	-0.03	-0.85	0.87	0.06		0.81	0.46	0.84	0.87	0.58	0.16	0.8	0.54	0.13	-0.39	0.66	-0.27	-0.82	0.74
Long Term Debt	1.0	0.72	0.54	0.85	0.55	0.61	0.49	-0.81	0.69	0.27	0.81		0.77	0.97	0.74	0.9	0.29	1.0	0.86	0.31	-0.48	0.94	0.24	-0.63	0.94
Common Stock	0.79	0.38	0.62	0.73	0.68	0.67	0.64	-0.54	0.34	0.56	0.46	0.77		0.72	0.43	0.77	0.22	0.76	0.95	0.41	-0.46	0.84	0.44	-0.16	0.81
Property Plant Equipment	0.97	0.77	0.46	0.8	0.51	0.52	0.35	-0.84	0.74	0.3	0.84	0.97	0.72		0.77	0.83	0.24	0.97	0.79	0.33	-0.43	0.87	0.08	-0.68	0.89
Current Deferred Revenue	0.73	0.76	0.14	0.78	0.39	0.18	-0.04	-0.82	0.77	0.09	0.87	0.74	0.43	0.77		0.46	0.08	0.73	0.49	0.44	-0.28	0.59	-0.26	-0.72	0.66
Treasury Stock	0.9	0.44	0.73	0.68	0.52	0.77	0.64	-0.65	0.42	0.15	0.58	0.9	0.77	0.83	0.46		0.27	0.89	0.89	0.15	-0.5	0.96	0.43	-0.34	0.89
Net Tangible Assets	0.32	0.07	0.37	0.21	0.17	0.37	0.42	0.21	-0.02	0.38	0.16	0.29	0.22	0.24	0.08	0.27		0.29	0.3	-0.1	0.01	0.39	0.35	0.07	0.36
Long Term Debt Total	0.99	0.75	0.5	0.82	0.53	0.57	0.5	-0.82	0.71	0.26	0.8	1.0	0.76	0.97	0.73	0.89	0.29		0.85	0.31	-0.48	0.93	0.26	-0.66	0.95
Capital Surpluse	0.86	0.45	0.65	0.74	0.61	0.7	0.68	-0.63	0.42	0.39	0.54	0.86	0.95	0.79	0.49	0.89	0.3	0.85		0.36	-0.49	0.94	0.47	-0.25	0.92
Deferred Long Term Liab	0.3	0.15	0.24	0.5	-0.08	0.26	0.17	-0.33	0.14	0.51	0.13	0.31	0.41	0.33	0.44	0.15	-0.1	0.31	0.36		0.04	0.23	0.09	-0.1	0.23
Short Long Term Debt	-0.48	-0.29	-0.3	-0.39	-0.45	-0.35	-0.34	0.39	-0.24	-0.17	-0.39	-0.48	-0.46	-0.43	-0.28	-0.5	0.01	-0.48	-0.49	0.04		-0.47	-0.23	0.25	-0.46
Net Invested Capital	0.94	0.52	0.69	0.76	0.6	0.73	0.63	-0.67	0.49	0.25	0.66	0.94	0.84	0.87	0.59	0.96	0.39	0.93	0.94	0.23	-0.47		0.4	-0.37	0.96
Net Working Capital	0.26	-0.17	0.49	0.13	0.27	0.54	0.96	0.16	-0.24	0.24	-0.27	0.24	0.44	0.08	-0.26	0.43	0.35	0.26	0.47	0.09	-0.23	0.4		0.24	0.35
Long Term Investments	-0.61	-0.94	0.25	-0.47	-0.17	0.18	0.1	0.79	-0.95	0.15	-0.82	-0.63	-0.16	-0.68	-0.72	-0.34	0.07	-0.66	-0.25	-0.1	0.25	-0.37	0.24		-0.54
Capital Stock	0.94	0.7	0.47	0.75	0.58	0.53	0.57	-0.76	0.67	0.19	0.74	0.94	0.81	0.89	0.66	0.89	0.36	0.95	0.92	0.23	-0.46	0.96	0.35	-0.54

Click cells to compare fundamentals

To calculate a Z-Score, one would need to know a company's current working capital, its total assets and liabilities, and the amount of its latest earnings as well as earnings before interest and tax. Z-Scores can be used to compare the odds of bankruptcy of companies in a similar line of business or firms operating in the same industry. Companies with Z-Scores above 3.1 are generally considered to be stable and healthy with a low probability of bankruptcy. Scores that fall between 1.8 and 3.1 lie in a so-called 'grey area,' with scores of less than 1 indicating the highest probability of distress. Z Score is a used widely measure by financial auditors, accountants, money managers, loan processors, wealth advisers, and day traders. In the last 25 years, many financial models that utilize z-scores proved it to be successful as a predictor of corporate bankruptcy.

Competition

Predict Full House

According to the company's disclosures, Full House Resorts has a Z Score of 0.0. This is 100.0% lower than that of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure sector and 100.0% lower than that of the Consumer Discretionary industry. The z score for all United States stocks is 100.0% higher than that of the company.

Full House Current Valuation Drivers

We derive many important indicators used in calculating different scores of Full House from analyzing Full House's financial statements. These drivers represent accounts that assess Full House's ability to generate profits relative to its revenue, operating costs, and shareholders' equity. Below are some of Full House's important valuation drivers and their relationship over time.

	2020	2021	2022	2023	2024	2025 (projected)
Market Cap	106.5M	393.8M	258.3M	185.4M	142.7M	149.8M
Enterprise Value	198.0M	626.4M	625.8M	664.1M	161.7M	100.8M

Full House ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Full House's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Full House's managers, analysts, and investors.

Environmental

Governance

Social

Full House Institutional Holders

Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in Full House that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may purchase large blocks of Full House's outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing Full House's value.

		Shares
American Century Companies Inc	2024-12-31	356.1 K
Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc.	2024-12-31	286.3 K
Northern Trust Corp	2024-12-31	275.4 K
Curi Rmb Capital	2024-12-31	260 K
One Wealth Advisors, Llc	2024-12-31	255 K
White Pine Capital Llc	2024-12-31	223.7 K
Anthracite Investment Co Inc	2024-12-31	148.4 K
Morgan Stanley - Brokerage Accounts	2024-12-31	137.8 K
Goldman Sachs Group Inc	2024-12-31	135.2 K
Blackrock Inc	2024-12-31	2.2 M
Vanguard Group Inc	2024-12-31	1.8 M

Full Fundamentals

	Return On Equity	-0.58
	Return On Asset	-0.0028
	Profit Margin	(0.15) %
	Operating Margin	0.01 %
	Current Valuation	632.03 M
	Shares Outstanding	35.6 M
	Shares Owned By Insiders	7.58 %
	Shares Owned By Institutions	47.42 %
	Number Of Shares Shorted	1.34 M
	Price To Book	3.57 X
	Price To Sales	0.49 X
	Revenue	258.75 M
	Gross Profit	143.5 M
	EBITDA	(41.55 M)
	Net Income	(40.67 M)
	Cash And Equivalents	108.23 M
	Cash Per Share	3.15 X
	Total Debt	59.26 M
	Debt To Equity	3.83 %
	Current Ratio	6.76 X
	Book Value Per Share	1.46 X
	Cash Flow From Operations	13.85 M
	Short Ratio	8.20 X
	Earnings Per Share	(1.18) X
	Price To Earnings To Growth	(2.33) X
	Target Price	5.69
	Number Of Employees	1.69 K
	Beta	1.99
	Market Capitalization	148.46 M
	Total Asset	666.63 M
	Retained Earnings	(75.29 M)
	Working Capital	(14.04 M)
	Current Asset	23.28 M
	Current Liabilities	18.45 M
	Net Asset	666.63 M

About Full House Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Full House Resorts's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Full House using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Full House Resorts based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.

Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!

The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.

Try AI Portfolio Architect

When determining whether Full House Resorts is a strong investment it is important to analyze Full House's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Full House's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Full Stock, refer to the following important reports:

How To Invest In Full

Details

Is Full Stock a good investment?

Details

What is Full House's Net Worth?

Details

Largest Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Companies

View

Largest Consumer Services Companies

View

Check out Full House Piotroski F Score and Full House Valuation analysis.

You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.

Is Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Full House. If investors know Full will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Full House listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.

Quarterly Earnings Growth

0.056

Earnings Share

(1.18)

Revenue Per Share

8.042

Quarterly Revenue Growth

0.058

Return On Assets

(0)

The market value of Full House Resorts is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Full that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Full House's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Full House's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Full House's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Full House's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.

Please note, there is a significant difference between Full House's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Full House is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Full House's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.

Macroaxis helps investors of all levels and skills to maximize the upside of all their holdings and minimize the risk associated with market volatility, economic swings, and company-specific events. View terms and conditions

Feedback Blog

Made with optimal in San Francisco

2024 Macroaxis LLC

Full House Resorts Stock Z Score

Full House Resorts Company Z Score Analysis

Z Score

Sum Of

5 Factors

First Factor

1.2 * (

Working Capital

/

Total Assets )

Second Factor

1.4 * (

Retained Earnings

/

Total Assets )

Thrid Factor

3.3 * (

EBITAD

/

Total Assets )

Fouth Factor

0.6 * (

Market Value of Equity

/

Total Liabilities )

Fifth Factor

0.99 * (

Revenue

/

Total Assets )

Full Z Score Driver Correlations

Full House Current Valuation Drivers

Full House ESG Sustainability

Full House Institutional Holders

Full Fundamentals

About Full House Fundamental Analysis

Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!

COMMON DESTINATIONS

MAIN CATEGORIES

COMPANY