Full House Resorts Stock Total Debt
| FLL Stock | USD 4.00 0.02 0.50% |
Full House Resorts fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Full House's financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Full Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Full House's intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Full House stock.
Full |
Full House Resorts Company Total Debt Analysis
Full House's Total Debt refers to the amount of long term interest-bearing liabilities that a company carries on its balance sheet. That may include bonds sold to the public, notes written to banks or capital leases. Typically, debt can help a company magnify its earnings, but the burden of interest and principal payments will eventually prevent the firm from borrow excessively.
Current Full House Total Debt | 59.26 M |
Most of Full House's fundamental indicators, such as Total Debt, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Full House Resorts is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
In most industries, total debt may also include the current portion of long-term debt. Since debt terms vary widely from one company to another, simply comparing outstanding debt obligations between different companies may not be adequate. It is usually meant to compare total debt amounts between companies that operate within the same sector.
| Competition |
Based on the latest financial disclosure, Full House Resorts has a Total Debt of 59.26 M. This is 98.46% lower than that of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure sector and 98.78% lower than that of the Consumer Discretionary industry. The total debt for all United States stocks is 98.89% higher than that of the company.
Full Total Debt Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Full House's direct or indirect competition against its Total Debt to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Full House could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Full House by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Full House is currently under evaluation in total debt category among its peers.
Full Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | -0.58 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0028 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (0.15) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.01 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 632.03 M | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 35.6 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 7.58 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 47.42 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 1.34 M | ||||
| Price To Book | 3.57 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 0.49 X | ||||
| Revenue | 292.06 M | ||||
| Gross Profit | 143.5 M | ||||
| EBITDA | 42.63 M | ||||
| Net Income | (40.67 M) | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 108.23 M | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 3.15 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 59.26 M | ||||
| Debt To Equity | 3.83 % | ||||
| Current Ratio | 6.76 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | 1.46 X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 13.85 M | ||||
| Short Ratio | 8.20 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | (1.18) X | ||||
| Price To Earnings To Growth | (2.33) X | ||||
| Target Price | 5.69 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 1.69 K | ||||
| Beta | 1.99 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 148.46 M | ||||
| Total Asset | 673.33 M | ||||
| Retained Earnings | (75.29 M) | ||||
| Working Capital | (14.04 M) | ||||
| Current Asset | 23.28 M | ||||
| Current Liabilities | 18.45 M | ||||
| Net Asset | 673.33 M |
About Full House Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Full House Resorts's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Full House using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Full House Resorts based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectCheck out Full House Piotroski F Score and Full House Altman Z Score analysis. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.
Is Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Full House. If investors know Full will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Full House listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
The market value of Full House Resorts is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Full that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Full House's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Full House's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Full House's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Full House's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Full House's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Full House is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Full House's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.