This module uses fundamental data of FACT II to approximate its Piotroski F score. FACT II F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of FACT II Acquisition. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about FACT II financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out FACT II Altman Z Score, FACT II Correlation, FACT II Valuation, as well as analyze FACT II Alpha and Beta and FACT II Hype Analysis.
FACT
Piotroski F Score
Ptb Ratio
Book Value Per Share
Free Cash Flow Yield
Operating Cash Flow Per Share
Pb Ratio
Free Cash Flow Per Share
Roic
Net Income Per Share
Cash Per Share
Pocfratio
Pfcf Ratio
Income Quality
Roe
Ev To Operating Cash Flow
Pe Ratio
Return On Tangible Assets
Ev To Free Cash Flow
Earnings Yield
Net Debt To E B I T D A
Current Ratio
Tangible Book Value Per Share
Graham Number
Shareholders Equity Per Share
Graham Net Net
Enterprise Value Over E B I T D A
Price Earnings Ratio
Price Book Value Ratio
Price To Operating Cash Flows Ratio
Price To Free Cash Flows Ratio
Company Equity Multiplier
Return On Capital Employed
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Price To Book Ratio
Price Cash Flow Ratio
Enterprise Value Multiple
Return On Assets
Price Fair Value
Return On Equity
Change In Cash
Free Cash Flow
Begin Period Cash Flow
Other Cashflows From Financing Activities
Other Non Cash Items
Total Cash From Operating Activities
Net Income
Total Cash From Financing Activities
End Period Cash Flow
Total Assets
Other Current Liab
Total Current Liabilities
Total Stockholder Equity
Retained Earnings
Non Current Assets Total
Non Currrent Assets Other
Common Stock Shares Outstanding
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity
Non Current Liabilities Total
Other Stockholder Equity
Total Liab
Net Invested Capital
Capital Stock
Common Stock
Net Debt
Accounts Payable
Cash
Cash And Short Term Investments
Other Current Assets
Total Current Assets
Interest Expense
Gross Profit
Other Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Ebitda
Cost Of Revenue
Total Operating Expenses
Income Before Tax
Total Other Income Expense Net
Income Tax Expense
Probability Of Bankruptcy
At this time, FACT II's Net Debt is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Short and Long Term Debt Total is likely to gain to about 75.6 M in 2025, despite the fact that Debt To Equity is likely to grow to (0.89). At this time, FACT II's Income Quality is comparatively stable compared to the past year. ROE is likely to gain to 3.32 in 2025, whereas Free Cash Flow Yield is likely to drop (0.0002) in 2025.
At this time, it appears that FACT II's Piotroski F Score is Frail. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to FACT II is to make sure FACT is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if FACT II's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if FACT II's financial numbers are properly reported.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between FACT II's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards FACT II in a much-optimized way.
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
Book Value Per Share
(0.003394)
At this time, FACT II's Book Value Per Share is comparatively stable compared to the past year.
FACT II ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, FACT II's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to FACT II's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social
About FACT II Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze FACT II Acquisition's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of FACT II using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of FACT II Acquisition based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Build portfolios using Macroaxis predefined set of investing ideas. Many of Macroaxis investing ideas can easily outperform a given market. Ideas can also be optimized per your risk profile before portfolio origination is invoked. Macroaxis thematic optimization helps investors identify companies most likely to benefit from changes or shifts in various micro-economic or local macro-level trends. Originating optimal thematic portfolios involves aligning investors' personal views, ideas, and beliefs with their actual investments.
When running FACT II's price analysis, check to measure FACT II's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy FACT II is operating at the current time. Most of FACT II's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of FACT II's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move FACT II's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of FACT II to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.