This module uses fundamental data of FACT II to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. FACT II M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out FACT II Piotroski F Score and FACT II Altman Z Score analysis.
FACT
Beneish M Score
Ptb Ratio
Book Value Per Share
Free Cash Flow Yield
Operating Cash Flow Per Share
Pb Ratio
Free Cash Flow Per Share
Roic
Net Income Per Share
Cash Per Share
Pocfratio
Pfcf Ratio
Income Quality
Roe
Ev To Operating Cash Flow
Pe Ratio
Return On Tangible Assets
Ev To Free Cash Flow
Earnings Yield
Net Debt To E B I T D A
Current Ratio
Tangible Book Value Per Share
Graham Number
Shareholders Equity Per Share
Graham Net Net
Enterprise Value Over E B I T D A
Price Earnings Ratio
Price Book Value Ratio
Price To Operating Cash Flows Ratio
Price To Free Cash Flows Ratio
Company Equity Multiplier
Return On Capital Employed
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Price To Book Ratio
Price Cash Flow Ratio
Enterprise Value Multiple
Return On Assets
Price Fair Value
Return On Equity
Change In Cash
Free Cash Flow
Begin Period Cash Flow
Other Cashflows From Financing Activities
Other Non Cash Items
Total Cash From Operating Activities
Net Income
Total Cash From Financing Activities
End Period Cash Flow
Total Assets
Other Current Liab
Total Current Liabilities
Total Stockholder Equity
Retained Earnings
Non Current Assets Total
Non Currrent Assets Other
Common Stock Shares Outstanding
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity
Non Current Liabilities Total
Other Stockholder Equity
Total Liab
Net Invested Capital
Capital Stock
Common Stock
Net Debt
Accounts Payable
Cash
Cash And Short Term Investments
Other Current Assets
Total Current Assets
Interest Expense
Gross Profit
Other Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Ebitda
Cost Of Revenue
Total Operating Expenses
Income Before Tax
Total Other Income Expense Net
Income Tax Expense
Probability Of Bankruptcy
At this time, FACT II's Net Debt is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Short and Long Term Debt Total is likely to gain to about 75.6 M in 2025, despite the fact that Debt To Equity is likely to grow to (0.89). At this time, FACT II's Income Quality is comparatively stable compared to the past year. ROE is likely to gain to 3.32 in 2025, whereas Free Cash Flow Yield is likely to drop (0.0002) in 2025.
At this time, it appears that FACT II Acquisition is an unlikely manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if FACT II's top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by FACT II executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of FACT II's earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if FACT II's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between FACT II's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards FACT II in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find FACT II's degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.
M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, FACT II's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to FACT II's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social
About FACT II Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze FACT II Acquisition's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of FACT II using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of FACT II Acquisition based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Build portfolios using Macroaxis predefined set of investing ideas. Many of Macroaxis investing ideas can easily outperform a given market. Ideas can also be optimized per your risk profile before portfolio origination is invoked. Macroaxis thematic optimization helps investors identify companies most likely to benefit from changes or shifts in various micro-economic or local macro-level trends. Originating optimal thematic portfolios involves aligning investors' personal views, ideas, and beliefs with their actual investments.
When running FACT II's price analysis, check to measure FACT II's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy FACT II is operating at the current time. Most of FACT II's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of FACT II's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move FACT II's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of FACT II to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.