This module uses fundamental data of Deere to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. Deere M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out Deere Piotroski F Score and Deere Altman Z Score analysis.
Deere
Beneish M Score
Market Cap
Enterprise Value
Change To Inventory
Change In Cash
Stock Based Compensation
Free Cash Flow
Change In Working Capital
Begin Period Cash Flow
Other Cashflows From Financing Activities
Depreciation
Other Non Cash Items
Dividends Paid
Capital Expenditures
Total Cash From Operating Activities
Net Income
Total Cash From Financing Activities
End Period Cash Flow
Sale Purchase Of Stock
Change To Account Receivables
Other Cashflows From Investing Activities
Change To Liabilities
Investments
Change Receivables
Net Borrowings
Total Cashflows From Investing Activities
Exchange Rate Changes
Cash And Cash Equivalents Changes
Cash Flows Other Operating
Change To Netincome
Change To Operating Activities
Issuance Of Capital Stock
Total Assets
Short Long Term Debt Total
Other Current Liab
Total Current Liabilities
Total Stockholder Equity
Property Plant And Equipment Net
Net Debt
Retained Earnings
Cash
Non Current Assets Total
Non Currrent Assets Other
Cash And Short Term Investments
Net Receivables
Common Stock Shares Outstanding
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity
Non Current Liabilities Total
Inventory
Other Current Assets
Other Stockholder Equity
Total Liab
Property Plant And Equipment Gross
Total Current Assets
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Short Term Debt
Accounts Payable
Intangible Assets
Common Stock Total Equity
Short Term Investments
Common Stock
Other Liab
Other Assets
Long Term Debt
Treasury Stock
Property Plant Equipment
Current Deferred Revenue
Good Will
Net Tangible Assets
Noncontrolling Interest In Consolidated Entity
Retained Earnings Total Equity
Long Term Debt Total
Deferred Long Term Liab
Long Term Investments
Non Current Liabilities Other
Short Long Term Debt
Cash And Equivalents
Net Invested Capital
Net Working Capital
Capital Stock
Capital Lease Obligations
Depreciation And Amortization
Interest Expense
Selling General Administrative
Total Revenue
Gross Profit
Other Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Ebit
Ebitda
Cost Of Revenue
Total Operating Expenses
Income Before Tax
Total Other Income Expense Net
Income Tax Expense
Research Development
Net Income Applicable To Common Shares
Net Income From Continuing Ops
Non Operating Income Net Other
Minority Interest
Tax Provision
Interest Income
Reconciled Depreciation
Net Interest Income
Selling And Marketing Expenses
Probability Of Bankruptcy
At present, Deere's Net Debt is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Short Term Debt is expected to grow to about 30.2 B, whereas Long Term Debt Total is forecasted to decline to about 29 B.
At this time, it appears that Deere Company is an unlikely manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if Deere's top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by Deere executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of Deere's earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if Deere's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between Deere's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Deere in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find Deere's degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.
M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.
Current Deferred Revenue
851.46 Million
At present, Deere's Current Deferred Revenue is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting.
Deere Earnings Manipulation Drivers
Although earnings manipulation is typically not the result of intentional misconduct by the c-level executives, it is still a widespread practice by the senior management of public companies such as Deere. It is usually done by a series of misrepresentations of various accounting rules and operating activities across multiple financial cycles. The best way to spot the manipulation is to examine the historical financial statement to find inconsistencies in earning reports to find trends in assets or liabilities that are not sustainable in the future.
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Deere's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Deere's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social
About Deere Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Deere Company's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Deere using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Deere Company based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.
You can also try the Technical Analysis module to check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data.
Is Agricultural & Farm Machinery space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Deere. If investors know Deere will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Deere listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
(0.38)
Earnings Share
25.63
Revenue Per Share
200.394
Quarterly Revenue Growth
(0.17)
Return On Assets
0.0786
The market value of Deere Company is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Deere that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Deere's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Deere's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Deere's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Deere's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Deere's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Deere is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Deere's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.