DBGI Stock | | | USD 3.69 0.16 4.16% |
This module uses fundamental data of Digital Brands to approximate its Piotroski F score. Digital Brands F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Digital Brands Group. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Digital Brands financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out
Digital Brands Altman Z Score,
Digital Brands Correlation,
Digital Brands Valuation, as well as analyze
Digital Brands Alpha and Beta and
Digital Brands Hype Analysis.
As of now, Digital Brands'
Short Term Debt is increasing as compared to previous years. The Digital Brands' current
Debt To Equity is estimated to increase to 4.89, while
Long Term Debt is projected to decrease to under 142.5
K. As of now, Digital Brands'
Average Payables is increasing as compared to previous years. The Digital Brands' current
PB Ratio is estimated to increase to 45.46, while
Price To Sales Ratio is projected to decrease to 4.42.
At this time, it appears that Digital Brands' Piotroski F Score is Frail. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized
Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of
predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
3.0
Piotroski F Score - Frail
| Current Return On Assets | Negative | Focus |
| Change in Return on Assets | Decreased | Focus |
| Cash Flow Return on Assets | Negative | Focus |
| Current Quality of Earnings (accrual) | Improving | Focus |
| Asset Turnover Growth | Decrease | Focus |
| Current Ratio Change | Increase | Focus |
| Long Term Debt Over Assets Change | Lower Leverage | Focus |
| Change In Outstending Shares | Increase | Focus |
| Change in Gross Margin | No Change | Focus |
Digital Brands Piotroski F Score Drivers
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Digital Brands is to make sure Digital is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Digital Brands' auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Digital Brands' financial numbers are properly reported.
Digital Brands Group F Score Driver Matrix
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical
financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Digital Brands' different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Digital Brands in a much-optimized way.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
About Digital Brands Piotroski F Score
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled
Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
Digital Brands ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Digital Brands' sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Digital Brands' managers, analysts, and investors.
About Digital Brands Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Digital Brands Group's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Digital Brands using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at
the intrinsic value of Digital Brands Group based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing
financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our
fundamental analysis page.
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
When determining whether Digital Brands Group is a strong investment it is important to analyze Digital Brands' competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Digital Brands'
future performance.
For an informed investment choice regarding Digital Stock, refer to the following important reports: Is Specialty Retail space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost
the valuation of Digital Brands. If investors know Digital will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Digital Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Earnings Share | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth | Return On Assets | Return On Equity |
The market value of Digital Brands Group is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Digital that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Digital Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Digital Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Digital Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Digital Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Digital Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine
if Digital Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Digital Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.