| DBGI Stock | | | USD 3.69 0.16 4.16% |
This module uses fundamental data of Digital Brands to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. Digital Brands M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out
Digital Brands Piotroski F Score and
Digital Brands Altman Z Score analysis.
As of now, Digital Brands'
Short Term Debt is increasing as compared to previous years. The Digital Brands' current
Debt To Equity is estimated to increase to 4.89, while
Long Term Debt is projected to decrease to under 142.5
K. As of now, Digital Brands'
Average Payables is increasing as compared to previous years. The Digital Brands' current
PB Ratio is estimated to increase to 45.46, while
Price To Sales Ratio is projected to decrease to 4.42.
At this time, it appears that Digital Brands Group is a possible manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if Digital Brands' top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by Digital Brands executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of Digital Brands' earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
-1.0
Beneish M Score - Possible Manipulator
| Elasticity of Receivables | |
| Financial Leverage Condition | |
Digital Brands Beneish M-Score Indicator Trends
The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if Digital Brands' auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
Digital Brands Group Beneish M-Score Driver Matrix
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical
financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between Digital Brands' different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Digital Brands in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find Digital Brands' degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
About Digital Brands Beneish M Score
M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled
The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed
financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.
Digital Brands ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Digital Brands' sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Digital Brands' managers, analysts, and investors.
About Digital Brands Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Digital Brands Group's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Digital Brands using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at
the intrinsic value of Digital Brands Group based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing
financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our
fundamental analysis page.
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
When determining whether Digital Brands Group is a strong investment it is important to analyze Digital Brands' competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Digital Brands'
future performance.
For an informed investment choice regarding Digital Stock, refer to the following important reports: Is Specialty Retail space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost
the valuation of Digital Brands. If investors know Digital will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Digital Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Earnings Share | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth | Return On Assets | Return On Equity |
The market value of Digital Brands Group is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Digital that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Digital Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Digital Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Digital Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Digital Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Digital Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine
if Digital Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Digital Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.