Design Co Stock Current Valuation
| 227100 Stock | KRW 698.00 89.00 14.61% |
Valuation analysis of Design helps investors to measure Design's intrinsic value by examining its available valuation indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes and income statement patterns.
Overvalued
Today
Please note that Design's price fluctuation is very steady at this time. Calculation of the real value of Design is based on 3 months time horizon. Increasing Design's time horizon generally increases the accuracy of value calculation and significantly improves the predictive power of the methodology used.
Since Design is currently traded on the exchange, buyers and sellers on that exchange determine the market value of Design Stock. However, Design's intrinsic value may or may not be the same as its current market price, in which case there is an opportunity to profit from the mispricing, assuming the market price will eventually merge with its intrinsic value. | Historical | Market 698.0 | Real 586.32 | Hype 698.0 | Naive 670.0 |
The real value of Design Stock, also known as its intrinsic value, is the underlying worth of Design Company, which is reflected in its stock price. It is based on Design's financial performance, growth prospects, management team, or industry conditions. The intrinsic value of Design's stock can be calculated using various methods such as discounted cash flow analysis, price-to-earnings ratio, or price-to-book ratio. That value may differ from its current market price, which is determined by supply and demand factors such as investor sentiment, market trends, or news.
Estimating the potential upside or downside of Design Co helps investors to forecast how Design stock's addition to their portfolios will impact the overall performance. We also use other valuation drivers to help us estimate the true value of Design more accurately as focusing exclusively on Design's fundamentals will not take into account other important factors: Design Co Company Current Valuation Analysis
Design's Enterprise Value is a firm valuation proxy that approximates the current market value of a company. It is typically used to determine the takeover or merger price of a firm. Unlike Market Cap, this measure takes into account the entire liquid asset, outstanding debt, and exotic equity instruments that the company has on its balance sheet. When a takeover occurs, the parent company will have to assume the target company's liabilities but will take possession of all cash and cash equivalents.
Current Design Current Valuation | 68.29 B |
Most of Design's fundamental indicators, such as Current Valuation, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Design Co is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
Enterprise Value can be a useful tool to compare companies with different capital structures. Long term liability and current cash or cash equivalents can have a huge impact on market valuation of a given company.
| Competition |
In accordance with the recently published financial statements, Design Co has a Current Valuation of 68.29 B. This is much higher than that of the sector and significantly higher than that of the Machinery, Tools, Heavy Vehicles, Trains & Ships industry. The current valuation for all Republic of Korea stocks is notably lower than that of the firm.
Design Current Valuation Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Design's direct or indirect competition against its Current Valuation to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Design could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Design by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Design is currently under evaluation in current valuation category among its peers.
Design Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | -37.29 | |||
| Return On Asset | -0.16 | |||
| Profit Margin | (0.40) % | |||
| Operating Margin | (0.15) % | |||
| Current Valuation | 68.29 B | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 2.66 M | |||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 25.14 % | |||
| Price To Sales | 0.60 X | |||
| Revenue | 13.23 B | |||
| Gross Profit | 3.28 B | |||
| EBITDA | (4.2 B) | |||
| Net Income | (19.5 B) | |||
| Cash And Equivalents | 36.27 B | |||
| Cash Per Share | 509.60 X | |||
| Total Debt | 3.62 B | |||
| Debt To Equity | 4.72 % | |||
| Current Ratio | 0.97 X | |||
| Cash Flow From Operations | (104.17 M) | |||
| Number Of Employees | 53 | |||
| Beta | 1.57 | |||
| Market Capitalization | 10.02 B | |||
| Total Asset | 65 B | |||
| Z Score | 1.2 | |||
| Net Asset | 65 B |
About Design Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Design Co's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Design using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Design Co based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Pair Trading with Design
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Design position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Design will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Design Stock
| 0.57 | 025950 | Dongsin Engineering | PairCorr |
| 0.54 | 050960 | SOOSAN INT | PairCorr |
| 0.51 | 045340 | Total Soft Bank | PairCorr |
| 0.37 | 241840 | ASTORY CoLtd | PairCorr |
| 0.37 | 035900 | JYP Entertainment | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Design could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Design when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Design - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Design Co to buy it.
The correlation of Design is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Design moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Design moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Design can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Other Information on Investing in Design Stock
Design financial ratios help investors to determine whether Design Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Design with respect to the benefits of owning Design security.