Design (Korea) Buy Hold or Sell Recommendation
227100 Stock | KRW 698.00 89.00 14.61% |
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon and your way above-average risk tolerance, our recommendation regarding Design Co is 'Sell'. Macroaxis provides Design buy-hold-or-sell recommendation only in the context of selected investment horizon and investor attitude towards risk assumed by holding Design positions.
Check out Design Analyst Recommendation to compare Macroaxis Buy or Sell Recommendation with the current analyst consensus. To check ratings for multiple equity instruments, please use the Instant Ratings tool. In addition, we conduct extensive research on individual companies such as Design and provide practical buy, sell, or hold advice based on investors' investing horizon and their risk tolerance towards Design Co. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors.
Design |
Execute Design Buy or Sell Advice
The Design recommendation should be used to complement the buy-or-sell advice compiled from the current analysts' consensus on Design Co. Macroaxis does not own or have any residual interests in Design Co or other equities on which the buy-or-sell advice is provided. Please provide your input below to execute Design's advice using the current market data and latest reported fundamentals.
Time Horizon
Risk Tolerance
Sell
Market Performance | Weak | Details | |
Volatility | Very steady | Details | |
Hype Condition | Stale | Details | |
Current Valuation | Overvalued | Details | |
Odds Of Distress | Below Average | Details | |
Economic Sensitivity | Actively responds to the market | Details | |
Analyst Consensus | Not Available | Details | |
Reporting Quality (M-Score) | Inapplicable | Details |
Design Trading Alerts and Improvement Suggestions
Design had very high historical volatility over the last 90 days | |
Design Co has accumulated 3.62 B in total debt with debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 4.72, indicating the company may have difficulties to generate enough cash to satisfy its financial obligations. Design has a current ratio of 0.95, indicating that it has a negative working capital and may not be able to pay financial obligations in time and when they become due. Debt can assist Design until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Design's shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Design sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Design to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Design's use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity. | |
The entity reported the revenue of 13.23 B. Net Loss for the year was (19.5 B) with profit before overhead, payroll, taxes, and interest of 3.28 B. | |
Design Co has accumulated about 36.27 B in cash with (104.17 M) of positive cash flow from operations. This results in cash-per-share (CPS) ratio of 509.6. | |
Roughly 25.0% of Design shares are owned by insiders or employees |
Design Returns Distribution Density
The distribution of Design's historical returns is an attempt to chart the uncertainty of Design's future price movements. The chart of the probability distribution of Design daily returns describes the distribution of returns around its average expected value. We use Design Co price's Value At Risk and its Upside Potential as a relative measure of the distribution. The graph of the distribution of Design returns is essential to provide solid investment advice for Design.
Mean Return | 0.55 | Value At Risk | -11.32 | Potential Upside | 29.93 | Standard Deviation | 10.51 |
Return Density |
Distribution |
Investment risk management requires an estimate of the probability of extreme price changes. Therefore, the correct representation of the distribution of Design historical returns presented in an easy-to-digest graphical form helps investors and money managers understand the risk-reward trade-off of different investement strategies.
Design Greeks
Most traded equities are subject to two types of risk - systematic (i.e., market) and unsystematic (i.e., nonmarket or company-specific) risk. Unsystematic risk is the risk that events specific to Design or Machinery, Tools, Heavy Vehicles, Trains & Ships sector will adversely affect the stock's price. This type of risk can be diversified away by owning several different stocks in different industries whose stock prices have shown a small correlation to each other. On the other hand, systematic risk is the risk that Design's price will be affected by overall stock market movements and cannot be diversified away. So, no matter how many positions you have, you cannot eliminate market risk. However, you can measure a Design stock's historical response to market movements and buy it if you are comfortable with its volatility direction. Beta and standard deviation are two commonly used measures to help you make the right decision.
α | Alpha over Dow Jones | 0.50 | |
β | Beta against Dow Jones | 1.95 | |
σ | Overall volatility | 10.14 | |
Ir | Information ratio | 0.05 |
Design Volatility Alert
Design Co is displaying above-average volatility over the selected time horizon. Understanding different market volatility trends often help investors to time the market. Properly using volatility indicators enable traders to measure Design's stock risk against market volatility during both bullish and bearish trends. The higher level of volatility that comes with bear markets can directly impact Design's stock price while adding stress to investors as they watch their shares' value plummet. This usually forces investors to rebalance their portfolios by buying different financial instruments as prices fall.Design Fundamentals Vs Peers
Comparing Design's fundamentals to the average values of its peers is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It helps to analyze Design's direct or indirect competition across all of the common fundamentals between Design and the related equities. This way, we can detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics as Design or determine the stocks which would be an excellent addition to an existing portfolio. Peer analysis of Design's fundamental indicators could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Design by comparing valuation metrics with those of similar companies.
Better Than Average | Worse Than Average | Compare Design to competition |
Fundamentals | Design | Peer Average |
Return On Equity | -37.29 | -0.31 |
Return On Asset | -0.16 | -0.14 |
Profit Margin | (0.40) % | (1.27) % |
Operating Margin | (0.15) % | (5.51) % |
Current Valuation | 68.29 B | 16.62 B |
Shares Outstanding | 2.66 M | 571.82 M |
Shares Owned By Insiders | 25.14 % | 10.09 % |
Price To Sales | 0.60 X | 11.42 X |
Revenue | 13.23 B | 9.43 B |
Gross Profit | 3.28 B | 27.38 B |
EBITDA | (4.2 B) | 3.9 B |
Net Income | (19.5 B) | 570.98 M |
Cash And Equivalents | 36.27 B | 2.7 B |
Cash Per Share | 509.60 X | 5.01 X |
Total Debt | 3.62 B | 5.32 B |
Debt To Equity | 4.72 % | 48.70 % |
Current Ratio | 0.97 X | 2.16 X |
Cash Flow From Operations | (104.17 M) | 971.22 M |
Number Of Employees | 53 | 18.84 K |
Beta | 1.57 | -0.15 |
Market Capitalization | 10.02 B | 19.03 B |
Total Asset | 65 B | 29.47 B |
Z Score | 1.2 | 8.72 |
Net Asset | 65 B |
Design Market Momentum
Traders often use several daily momentume indicators to supplement a more traditional technical analysis when analyzing securities such as Design . With many different options, investors must choose the best indicators for them and familiarize themselves with how they work. We suggest combining traditional momentum indicators with more near-term forms of technical analysis such as Accumulation Distribution or Daily Balance Of Power. With their quantitative nature, daily value technical indicators can also be incorporated into your automated trading systems.
About Design Buy or Sell Advice
When is the right time to buy or sell Design Co? Buying financial instruments such as Design Stock isn't very hard. However, what challenging for most investors is doing it at the right time to beat the market. Proper market timing is something most people cannot do without sophisticated tools, which help to isolate the right opportunities. Macroaxis provides hands-on modules to deliver winning trades and diversify your portfolios on a daily basis. Most of our advising modules are very easy to use and apply.
Please read more on our stock advisor page.
Use Investing Ideas to Build Portfolios
In addition to having Design in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Rentals Thematic Idea Now
Rentals
Companies providing rental and leasing services to public and business. The Rentals theme has 37 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Rentals Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
View All Next | Launch |
Other Information on Investing in Design Stock
Design financial ratios help investors to determine whether Design Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Design with respect to the benefits of owning Design security.