Correlation Between Vera Bradley and Procter Gamble

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Vera Bradley and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Vera Bradley and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Vera Bradley and Procter Gamble, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Vera Bradley and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Vera Bradley with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Vera Bradley and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Vera Bradley and Procter Gamble

-0.44

Correlation Coefficient

Vera Bradley  Procter Gamble

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Vera and Procter is -0.44. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Vera Bradley and Procter Gamble in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble and Vera Bradley is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Vera Bradley are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble has no effect on the direction of Vera Bradley i.e., Vera Bradley and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Vera Bradley and Procter Gamble

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Vera Bradley is expected to under-perform the Procter Gamble. In addition to that, Vera Bradley is 3.31 times more volatile than Procter Gamble. It trades about -0.16 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  16,850  in Procter Gamble on December 27, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (192.00) from holding Procter Gamble or give up 1.14% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Vera Bradley  vs.  Procter Gamble

Vera Bradley

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Vera Bradley has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.

Procter Gamble

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Pair Trading with Vera Bradley and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Vera Bradley and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Vera Bradley position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.

The idea behind Vera Bradley and Procter Gamble pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.