Correlation Between Visa and Beijing Cisri
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Visa Class A and Beijing Cisri Gaona, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Visa and Beijing Cisri and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Visa with a short position of Beijing Cisri. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Visa and Beijing Cisri.
Diversification Opportunities for Visa and Beijing Cisri
0.32 | Correlation Coefficient |
Weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Visa and Beijing is 0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Visa Class A and Beijing Cisri Gaona in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Beijing Cisri Gaona and Visa is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Visa Class A are associated (or correlated) with Beijing Cisri. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Beijing Cisri Gaona has no effect on the direction of Visa i.e., Visa and Beijing Cisri go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Visa and Beijing Cisri
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Visa Class A is expected to generate 0.39 times more return on investment than Beijing Cisri. However, Visa Class A is 2.54 times less risky than Beijing Cisri. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Beijing Cisri Gaona is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest 26,555 in Visa Class A on September 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 5,167 from holding Visa Class A or generate 19.46% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 96.8% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Visa Class A vs. Beijing Cisri Gaona
Performance |
Timeline |
Visa Class A |
Beijing Cisri Gaona |
Visa and Beijing Cisri Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Visa and Beijing Cisri
The main advantage of trading using opposite Visa and Beijing Cisri positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Visa position performs unexpectedly, Beijing Cisri can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Beijing Cisri will offset losses from the drop in Beijing Cisri's long position.Visa vs. American Express | Visa vs. PayPal Holdings | Visa vs. Capital One Financial | Visa vs. Upstart Holdings |
Beijing Cisri vs. New China Life | Beijing Cisri vs. Ming Yang Smart | Beijing Cisri vs. 159681 | Beijing Cisri vs. 159005 |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Flow Index module to determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators.
Other Complementary Tools
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences | |
Money Flow Index Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators | |
Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |