Correlation Between Under Armour and Fossil

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Under Armour and Fossil at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Under Armour and Fossil into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Under Armour A and Fossil Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Under Armour and Fossil and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Under Armour with a short position of Fossil. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Under Armour and Fossil.

Diversification Opportunities for Under Armour and Fossil

0.12

Correlation Coefficient

Under Armour  Fossil

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Under and Fossil is 0.12. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Under Armour A and Fossil Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fossil Group and Under Armour is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Under Armour A are associated (or correlated) with Fossil. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fossil Group has no effect on the direction of Under Armour i.e., Under Armour and Fossil go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Under Armour and Fossil

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Under Armour A is expected to under-perform the Fossil. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Under Armour A is 1.79 times less risky than Fossil. The stock trades about -0.29 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Fossil Group is currently generating about -0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  169.00  in Fossil Group on November 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (14.00) from holding Fossil Group or give up 8.28% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Under Armour A  vs.  Fossil Group

Under Armour A

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Under Armour A has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite inconsistent performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.

Fossil Group

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fossil Group are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite abnormal basic indicators, Fossil disclosed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Under Armour and Fossil

The main advantage of trading using opposite Under Armour and Fossil positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Under Armour position performs unexpectedly, Fossil can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fossil will offset losses from the drop in Fossil's long position.

The idea behind Under Armour A and Fossil Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.