Correlation Between Scientific Games and Uber Technologies

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Scientific Games and Uber Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Scientific Games and Uber Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Scientific Games and Uber Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Scientific Games and Uber Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Scientific Games with a short position of Uber Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Scientific Games and Uber Technologies.

Diversification Opportunities for Scientific Games and Uber Technologies

0.05
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Scientific and Uber is 0.05. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Scientific Games and Uber Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Uber Technologies and Scientific Games is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Scientific Games are associated (or correlated) with Uber Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Uber Technologies has no effect on the direction of Scientific Games i.e., Scientific Games and Uber Technologies go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Scientific Games and Uber Technologies

Assuming the 90 days horizon Scientific Games is expected to generate 2.33 times less return on investment than Uber Technologies. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Scientific Games is 1.17 times less risky than Uber Technologies. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Uber Technologies is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,712  in Uber Technologies on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,118  from holding Uber Technologies or generate 114.97% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Scientific Games  vs.  Uber Technologies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Scientific Games 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Scientific Games has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Scientific Games is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Uber Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Uber Technologies has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest uncertain performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the newest uproar on Wall Street may also be a sign of mid-term gains for the firm private investors.

Scientific Games and Uber Technologies Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Scientific Games and Uber Technologies

The main advantage of trading using opposite Scientific Games and Uber Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Scientific Games position performs unexpectedly, Uber Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Uber Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Uber Technologies' long position.
The idea behind Scientific Games and Uber Technologies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Suggestion module to get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities