Correlation Between North American and Scientific Games

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both North American and Scientific Games at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining North American and Scientific Games into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between North American Construction and Scientific Games, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on North American and Scientific Games and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in North American with a short position of Scientific Games. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of North American and Scientific Games.

Diversification Opportunities for North American and Scientific Games

0.38

Correlation Coefficient

North American  Scientific Games

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between North and Scientific is 0.38. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding North American Construction and Scientific Games in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Scientific Games and North American is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on North American Construction are associated (or correlated) with Scientific Games. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Scientific Games has no effect on the direction of North American i.e., North American and Scientific Games go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between North American and Scientific Games

Assuming the 90 days horizon North American Construction is expected to generate 1.41 times more return on investment than Scientific Games. However, North American is 1.41 times more volatile than Scientific Games. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Scientific Games is currently generating about -0.26 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,790  in North American Construction on September 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  140.00  from holding North American Construction or generate 7.82% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

North American Construction  vs.  Scientific Games

North American Const

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in North American Construction are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, North American reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Scientific Games

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Scientific Games are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Scientific Games is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Pair Trading with North American and Scientific Games

The main advantage of trading using opposite North American and Scientific Games positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if North American position performs unexpectedly, Scientific Games can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Scientific Games will offset losses from the drop in Scientific Games' long position.

The idea behind North American Construction and Scientific Games pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Cryptocurrency Center module to build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency.