Correlation Between Smithson Investment and Naked Wines

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Smithson Investment and Naked Wines at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Smithson Investment and Naked Wines into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Smithson Investment Trust and Naked Wines plc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Smithson Investment and Naked Wines and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Smithson Investment with a short position of Naked Wines. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Smithson Investment and Naked Wines.

Diversification Opportunities for Smithson Investment and Naked Wines

-0.54
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Smithson and Naked is -0.54. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Smithson Investment Trust and Naked Wines plc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Naked Wines plc and Smithson Investment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Smithson Investment Trust are associated (or correlated) with Naked Wines. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Naked Wines plc has no effect on the direction of Smithson Investment i.e., Smithson Investment and Naked Wines go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Smithson Investment and Naked Wines

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Smithson Investment Trust is expected to generate 0.35 times more return on investment than Naked Wines. However, Smithson Investment Trust is 2.88 times less risky than Naked Wines. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Naked Wines plc is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  138,400  in Smithson Investment Trust on October 11, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  5,200  from holding Smithson Investment Trust or generate 3.76% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy99.6%
ValuesDaily Returns

Smithson Investment Trust  vs.  Naked Wines plc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Smithson Investment Trust 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Smithson Investment Trust are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Smithson Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Naked Wines plc 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Naked Wines plc has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Smithson Investment and Naked Wines Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Smithson Investment and Naked Wines

The main advantage of trading using opposite Smithson Investment and Naked Wines positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Smithson Investment position performs unexpectedly, Naked Wines can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Naked Wines will offset losses from the drop in Naked Wines' long position.
The idea behind Smithson Investment Trust and Naked Wines plc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the AI Portfolio Architect module to use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.