Correlation Between Pfeiffer Vacuum and Smithson Investment

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Pfeiffer Vacuum and Smithson Investment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Pfeiffer Vacuum and Smithson Investment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology and Smithson Investment Trust, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Pfeiffer Vacuum and Smithson Investment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Pfeiffer Vacuum with a short position of Smithson Investment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Pfeiffer Vacuum and Smithson Investment.

Diversification Opportunities for Pfeiffer Vacuum and Smithson Investment

0.1
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Pfeiffer and Smithson is 0.1. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology and Smithson Investment Trust in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Smithson Investment Trust and Pfeiffer Vacuum is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology are associated (or correlated) with Smithson Investment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Smithson Investment Trust has no effect on the direction of Pfeiffer Vacuum i.e., Pfeiffer Vacuum and Smithson Investment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Pfeiffer Vacuum and Smithson Investment

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Pfeiffer Vacuum is expected to generate 1.15 times less return on investment than Smithson Investment. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology is 2.22 times less risky than Smithson Investment. It trades about 0.36 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Smithson Investment Trust is currently generating about 0.18 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  147,200  in Smithson Investment Trust on October 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4,600  from holding Smithson Investment Trust or generate 3.13% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology  vs.  Smithson Investment Trust

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Pfeiffer Vacuum Tech 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Pfeiffer Vacuum is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Smithson Investment Trust 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Smithson Investment Trust are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Smithson Investment may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

Pfeiffer Vacuum and Smithson Investment Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Pfeiffer Vacuum and Smithson Investment

The main advantage of trading using opposite Pfeiffer Vacuum and Smithson Investment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Pfeiffer Vacuum position performs unexpectedly, Smithson Investment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Smithson Investment will offset losses from the drop in Smithson Investment's long position.
The idea behind Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology and Smithson Investment Trust pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets