Correlation Between Siit Global and Columbia Greater

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Siit Global and Columbia Greater at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Siit Global and Columbia Greater into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Siit Global Managed and Columbia Greater China, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Siit Global and Columbia Greater and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Siit Global with a short position of Columbia Greater. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Siit Global and Columbia Greater.

Diversification Opportunities for Siit Global and Columbia Greater

0.19
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Siit and Columbia is 0.19. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Siit Global Managed and Columbia Greater China in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Greater China and Siit Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Siit Global Managed are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Greater. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Greater China has no effect on the direction of Siit Global i.e., Siit Global and Columbia Greater go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Siit Global and Columbia Greater

Assuming the 90 days horizon Siit Global Managed is expected to under-perform the Columbia Greater. In addition to that, Siit Global is 1.98 times more volatile than Columbia Greater China. It trades about -0.32 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Greater China is currently generating about -0.31 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  3,941  in Columbia Greater China on October 8, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (274.00) from holding Columbia Greater China or give up 6.95% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Siit Global Managed  vs.  Columbia Greater China

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Siit Global Managed 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Siit Global Managed has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.
Columbia Greater China 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Columbia Greater China has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Siit Global and Columbia Greater Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Siit Global and Columbia Greater

The main advantage of trading using opposite Siit Global and Columbia Greater positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Siit Global position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Greater can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Greater will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Greater's long position.
The idea behind Siit Global Managed and Columbia Greater China pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Analyzer module to portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine.

Other Complementary Tools

Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance