Correlation Between Balanced Strategy and Columbia Greater

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Balanced Strategy and Columbia Greater at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Balanced Strategy and Columbia Greater into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Balanced Strategy Fund and Columbia Greater China, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Balanced Strategy and Columbia Greater and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Balanced Strategy with a short position of Columbia Greater. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Balanced Strategy and Columbia Greater.

Diversification Opportunities for Balanced Strategy and Columbia Greater

0.04

Correlation Coefficient

Balanced Strategy  Columbia Greater

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Balanced and Columbia is 0.04. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Balanced Strategy Fund and Columbia Greater China in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Greater China and Balanced Strategy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Balanced Strategy Fund are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Greater. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Greater China has no effect on the direction of Balanced Strategy i.e., Balanced Strategy and Columbia Greater go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Balanced Strategy and Columbia Greater

Assuming the 90 days horizon Balanced Strategy Fund is expected to generate 0.27 times more return on investment than Columbia Greater. However, Balanced Strategy Fund is 3.71 times less risky than Columbia Greater. It trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Greater China is currently generating about -0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,036  in Balanced Strategy Fund on October 9, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (12.00) from holding Balanced Strategy Fund or give up 1.16% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	98.39%
Values	Daily Returns

Balanced Strategy Fund  vs.  Columbia Greater China

Balanced Strategy

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Balanced Strategy Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Balanced Strategy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Columbia Greater China

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Columbia Greater China has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Pair Trading with Balanced Strategy and Columbia Greater

The main advantage of trading using opposite Balanced Strategy and Columbia Greater positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Balanced Strategy position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Greater can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Greater will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Greater's long position.

The idea behind Balanced Strategy Fund and Columbia Greater China pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.