Correlation Between Sports Entertainment and Retail Food

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Sports Entertainment and Retail Food at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Sports Entertainment and Retail Food into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Sports Entertainment Group and Retail Food Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Sports Entertainment and Retail Food and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Sports Entertainment with a short position of Retail Food. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Sports Entertainment and Retail Food.

Diversification Opportunities for Sports Entertainment and Retail Food

0.0
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Sports and Retail is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Sports Entertainment Group and Retail Food Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Retail Food Group and Sports Entertainment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Sports Entertainment Group are associated (or correlated) with Retail Food. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Retail Food Group has no effect on the direction of Sports Entertainment i.e., Sports Entertainment and Retail Food go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Sports Entertainment and Retail Food

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Sports Entertainment Group is expected to generate 1.33 times more return on investment than Retail Food. However, Sports Entertainment is 1.33 times more volatile than Retail Food Group. It trades about -0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Retail Food Group is currently generating about -0.22 per unit of risk. If you would invest  23.00  in Sports Entertainment Group on October 5, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (3.00) from holding Sports Entertainment Group or give up 13.04% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionFlat 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Sports Entertainment Group  vs.  Retail Food Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Sports Entertainment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Sports Entertainment Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.
Retail Food Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Retail Food Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Retail Food is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Sports Entertainment and Retail Food Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Sports Entertainment and Retail Food

The main advantage of trading using opposite Sports Entertainment and Retail Food positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Sports Entertainment position performs unexpectedly, Retail Food can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Retail Food will offset losses from the drop in Retail Food's long position.
The idea behind Sports Entertainment Group and Retail Food Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume