Correlation Between Australian Agricultural and Retail Food

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Australian Agricultural and Retail Food at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Australian Agricultural and Retail Food into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Australian Agricultural and Retail Food Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Australian Agricultural and Retail Food and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Australian Agricultural with a short position of Retail Food. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Australian Agricultural and Retail Food.

Diversification Opportunities for Australian Agricultural and Retail Food

-0.28
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Australian and Retail is -0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Australian Agricultural and Retail Food Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Retail Food Group and Australian Agricultural is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Australian Agricultural are associated (or correlated) with Retail Food. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Retail Food Group has no effect on the direction of Australian Agricultural i.e., Australian Agricultural and Retail Food go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Australian Agricultural and Retail Food

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Australian Agricultural is expected to generate 0.41 times more return on investment than Retail Food. However, Australian Agricultural is 2.44 times less risky than Retail Food. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Retail Food Group is currently generating about -0.12 per unit of risk. If you would invest  137.00  in Australian Agricultural on November 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  15.00  from holding Australian Agricultural or generate 10.95% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Australian Agricultural  vs.  Retail Food Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Australian Agricultural 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Australian Agricultural are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain fundamental indicators, Australian Agricultural may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in March 2025.
Retail Food Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Retail Food Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Australian Agricultural and Retail Food Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Australian Agricultural and Retail Food

The main advantage of trading using opposite Australian Agricultural and Retail Food positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Australian Agricultural position performs unexpectedly, Retail Food can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Retail Food will offset losses from the drop in Retail Food's long position.
The idea behind Australian Agricultural and Retail Food Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data