Correlation Between Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Regional Management Corp and Manhattan Bridge Capital, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Regional Management with a short position of Manhattan Bridge. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge.

Diversification Opportunities for Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge

-0.01
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Regional and Manhattan is -0.01. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Regional Management Corp and Manhattan Bridge Capital in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Manhattan Bridge Capital and Regional Management is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Regional Management Corp are associated (or correlated) with Manhattan Bridge. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Manhattan Bridge Capital has no effect on the direction of Regional Management i.e., Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Regional Management Corp is expected to under-perform the Manhattan Bridge. In addition to that, Regional Management is 1.68 times more volatile than Manhattan Bridge Capital. It trades about -0.03 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Manhattan Bridge Capital is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  565.00  in Manhattan Bridge Capital on December 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  17.00  from holding Manhattan Bridge Capital or generate 3.01% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Regional Management Corp  vs.  Manhattan Bridge Capital

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Regional Management Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Regional Management Corp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy primary indicators, Regional Management is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Manhattan Bridge Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Manhattan Bridge Capital are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Manhattan Bridge is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge

The main advantage of trading using opposite Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Regional Management position performs unexpectedly, Manhattan Bridge can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Manhattan Bridge will offset losses from the drop in Manhattan Bridge's long position.
The idea behind Regional Management Corp and Manhattan Bridge Capital pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.