Correlation Between Procter Gamble and LEVEL

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and LEVEL at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and LEVEL into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and LEVEL 3 FING, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and LEVEL and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of LEVEL. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and LEVEL.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and LEVEL

-0.06
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and LEVEL is -0.06. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and LEVEL 3 FING in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on LEVEL 3 FING and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with LEVEL. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of LEVEL 3 FING has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and LEVEL go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and LEVEL

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 0.31 times more return on investment than LEVEL. However, Procter Gamble is 3.21 times less risky than LEVEL. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. LEVEL 3 FING is currently generating about -0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  16,608  in Procter Gamble on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  195.00  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 1.17% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy59.68%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  LEVEL 3 FING

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
LEVEL 3 FING 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days LEVEL 3 FING has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite unsteady performance in the last few months, the Bond's basic indicators remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for LEVEL 3 FING investors.

Procter Gamble and LEVEL Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and LEVEL

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and LEVEL positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, LEVEL can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in LEVEL will offset losses from the drop in LEVEL's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and LEVEL 3 FING pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data