Correlation Between Procter Gamble and INTEL

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and INTEL at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and INTEL into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and INTEL PORATION, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and INTEL and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of INTEL. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and INTEL.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and INTEL

0.36
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and INTEL is 0.36. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and INTEL PORATION in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on INTEL PORATION and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with INTEL. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of INTEL PORATION has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and INTEL go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and INTEL

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 47.33 times less return on investment than INTEL. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Procter Gamble is 1.33 times less risky than INTEL. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. INTEL PORATION is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  7,749  in INTEL PORATION on December 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  876.00  from holding INTEL PORATION or generate 11.3% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  INTEL PORATION

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
INTEL PORATION 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in INTEL PORATION are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat inconsistent basic indicators, INTEL may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.

Procter Gamble and INTEL Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and INTEL

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and INTEL positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, INTEL can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in INTEL will offset losses from the drop in INTEL's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and INTEL PORATION pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments