Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Boston Omaha

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Boston Omaha at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Boston Omaha into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Boston Omaha Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Boston Omaha and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Boston Omaha. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Boston Omaha.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Boston Omaha

0.13
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Boston is 0.13. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Boston Omaha Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Boston Omaha Corp and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Boston Omaha. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Boston Omaha Corp has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Boston Omaha go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Boston Omaha

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 0.82 times more return on investment than Boston Omaha. However, Procter Gamble is 1.22 times less risky than Boston Omaha. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Boston Omaha Corp is currently generating about -0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  16,816  in Procter Gamble on December 19, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (45.00) from holding Procter Gamble or give up 0.27% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Boston Omaha Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Boston Omaha Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Boston Omaha Corp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound basic indicators, Boston Omaha is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Procter Gamble and Boston Omaha Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Boston Omaha

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Boston Omaha positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Boston Omaha can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Boston Omaha will offset losses from the drop in Boston Omaha's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Boston Omaha Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal