Correlation Between MOLSON COORS and TIMES CHINA

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both MOLSON COORS and TIMES CHINA at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining MOLSON COORS and TIMES CHINA into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between MOLSON RS BEVERAGE and TIMES CHINA HLDGS, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on MOLSON COORS and TIMES CHINA and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in MOLSON COORS with a short position of TIMES CHINA. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of MOLSON COORS and TIMES CHINA.

Diversification Opportunities for MOLSON COORS and TIMES CHINA

-0.2

Correlation Coefficient

MOLSON COORS  TIMES CHINA

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between MOLSON and TIMES is -0.2. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding MOLSON RS BEVERAGE and TIMES CHINA HLDGS in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on TIMES CHINA HLDGS and MOLSON COORS is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on MOLSON RS BEVERAGE are associated (or correlated) with TIMES CHINA. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of TIMES CHINA HLDGS has no effect on the direction of MOLSON COORS i.e., MOLSON COORS and TIMES CHINA go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between MOLSON COORS and TIMES CHINA

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon MOLSON RS BEVERAGE is expected to under-perform the TIMES CHINA. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, MOLSON RS BEVERAGE is 5.9 times less risky than TIMES CHINA. The stock trades about -0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The TIMES CHINA HLDGS is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  14.00  in TIMES CHINA HLDGS on October 10, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (10.55) from holding TIMES CHINA HLDGS or give up 75.36% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	99.8%
Values	Daily Returns

MOLSON RS BEVERAGE  vs.  TIMES CHINA HLDGS

MOLSON RS BEVERAGE

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in MOLSON RS BEVERAGE are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, MOLSON COORS is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

TIMES CHINA HLDGS

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in TIMES CHINA HLDGS are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, TIMES CHINA reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with MOLSON COORS and TIMES CHINA

The main advantage of trading using opposite MOLSON COORS and TIMES CHINA positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if MOLSON COORS position performs unexpectedly, TIMES CHINA can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in TIMES CHINA will offset losses from the drop in TIMES CHINA's long position.

The idea behind MOLSON RS BEVERAGE and TIMES CHINA HLDGS pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.