Correlation Between FAIR ISAAC and TIMES CHINA

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FAIR ISAAC and TIMES CHINA at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FAIR ISAAC and TIMES CHINA into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between FAIR ISAAC and TIMES CHINA HLDGS, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FAIR ISAAC and TIMES CHINA and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FAIR ISAAC with a short position of TIMES CHINA. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FAIR ISAAC and TIMES CHINA.

Diversification Opportunities for FAIR ISAAC and TIMES CHINA

-0.15
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between FAIR and TIMES is -0.15. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FAIR ISAAC and TIMES CHINA HLDGS in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on TIMES CHINA HLDGS and FAIR ISAAC is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FAIR ISAAC are associated (or correlated) with TIMES CHINA. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of TIMES CHINA HLDGS has no effect on the direction of FAIR ISAAC i.e., FAIR ISAAC and TIMES CHINA go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FAIR ISAAC and TIMES CHINA

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon FAIR ISAAC is expected to generate 41.68 times less return on investment than TIMES CHINA. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, FAIR ISAAC is 2.72 times less risky than TIMES CHINA. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. TIMES CHINA HLDGS is currently generating about 0.02 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3.10  in TIMES CHINA HLDGS on October 25, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.15) from holding TIMES CHINA HLDGS or give up 4.84% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

FAIR ISAAC  vs.  TIMES CHINA HLDGS

 Performance 
       Timeline  
FAIR ISAAC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days FAIR ISAAC has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound forward indicators, FAIR ISAAC is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
TIMES CHINA HLDGS 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in TIMES CHINA HLDGS are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, TIMES CHINA may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

FAIR ISAAC and TIMES CHINA Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with FAIR ISAAC and TIMES CHINA

The main advantage of trading using opposite FAIR ISAAC and TIMES CHINA positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FAIR ISAAC position performs unexpectedly, TIMES CHINA can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in TIMES CHINA will offset losses from the drop in TIMES CHINA's long position.
The idea behind FAIR ISAAC and TIMES CHINA HLDGS pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sync Your Broker module to sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors..

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities