Correlation Between Minerals Technologies and Lincoln Educational
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Minerals Technologies and Lincoln Educational at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Minerals Technologies and Lincoln Educational into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Minerals Technologies and Lincoln Educational Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Minerals Technologies and Lincoln Educational and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Minerals Technologies with a short position of Lincoln Educational. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Minerals Technologies and Lincoln Educational.
Diversification Opportunities for Minerals Technologies and Lincoln Educational
0.77 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Minerals and Lincoln is 0.77. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Minerals Technologies and Lincoln Educational Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Lincoln Educational and Minerals Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Minerals Technologies are associated (or correlated) with Lincoln Educational. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Lincoln Educational has no effect on the direction of Minerals Technologies i.e., Minerals Technologies and Lincoln Educational go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Minerals Technologies and Lincoln Educational
Considering the 90-day investment horizon Minerals Technologies is expected to under-perform the Lincoln Educational. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Minerals Technologies is 1.62 times less risky than Lincoln Educational. The stock trades about -0.33 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Lincoln Educational Services is currently generating about -0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 1,635 in Lincoln Educational Services on September 25, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (48.00) from holding Lincoln Educational Services or give up 2.94% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Minerals Technologies vs. Lincoln Educational Services
Performance |
Timeline |
Minerals Technologies |
Lincoln Educational |
Minerals Technologies and Lincoln Educational Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Minerals Technologies and Lincoln Educational
The main advantage of trading using opposite Minerals Technologies and Lincoln Educational positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Minerals Technologies position performs unexpectedly, Lincoln Educational can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Lincoln Educational will offset losses from the drop in Lincoln Educational's long position.The idea behind Minerals Technologies and Lincoln Educational Services pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Lincoln Educational vs. Lixiang Education Holding | Lincoln Educational vs. Jianzhi Education Technology | Lincoln Educational vs. Golden Sun Education |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bollinger Bands module to use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon.
Other Complementary Tools
Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like | |
ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments | |
Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume |