Correlation Between Amg Managers and Goldman Sachs

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Amg Managers and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Amg Managers and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Amg Managers Centersquare and Goldman Sachs Small, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Amg Managers and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Amg Managers with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Amg Managers and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Amg Managers and Goldman Sachs

-0.02

Correlation Coefficient

Amg Managers  Goldman Sachs

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Amg and Goldman is -0.02. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Amg Managers Centersquare and Goldman Sachs Small in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Small and Amg Managers is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Amg Managers Centersquare are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Small has no effect on the direction of Amg Managers i.e., Amg Managers and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Amg Managers and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Amg Managers Centersquare is expected to under-perform the Goldman Sachs. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Amg Managers Centersquare is 2.45 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. The mutual fund trades about -0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Goldman Sachs Small is currently generating about -0.02 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,874  in Goldman Sachs Small on September 17, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (120.00) from holding Goldman Sachs Small or give up 4.18% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Amg Managers Centersquare  vs.  Goldman Sachs Small

Amg Managers Centersquare

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Amg Managers Centersquare has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Amg Managers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs Small

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Small has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Amg Managers and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Amg Managers and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Amg Managers position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.

The idea behind Amg Managers Centersquare and Goldman Sachs Small pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.