Correlation Between Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Redwood Real Estate and Goldman Sachs Small, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Redwood Real with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs

0.61

Correlation Coefficient

Redwood Real  Goldman Sachs

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Redwood and Goldman is 0.61. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Redwood Real Estate and Goldman Sachs Small in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Small and Redwood Real is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Redwood Real Estate are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Small has no effect on the direction of Redwood Real i.e., Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Redwood Real Estate is expected to generate 0.05 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, Redwood Real Estate is 19.42 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about -0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Small is currently generating about -0.13 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,517  in Redwood Real Estate on September 17, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (4.00) from holding Redwood Real Estate or give up 0.16% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Redwood Real Estate  vs.  Goldman Sachs Small

Redwood Real Estate

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Redwood Real Estate are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Redwood Real is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs Small

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Small has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Redwood Real position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.

The idea behind Redwood Real Estate and Goldman Sachs Small pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Flow Index module to determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators.