Correlation Between McKesson and Procter Gamble

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both McKesson and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining McKesson and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between McKesson and Procter Gamble DRC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on McKesson and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in McKesson with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of McKesson and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for McKesson and Procter Gamble

0.31
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between McKesson and Procter is 0.31. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding McKesson and Procter Gamble DRC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble DRC and McKesson is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on McKesson are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble DRC has no effect on the direction of McKesson i.e., McKesson and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between McKesson and Procter Gamble

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon McKesson is expected to generate 2.05 times more return on investment than Procter Gamble. However, McKesson is 2.05 times more volatile than Procter Gamble DRC. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble DRC is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,010,057  in McKesson on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  189,511  from holding McKesson or generate 18.76% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy97.62%
ValuesDaily Returns

McKesson  vs.  Procter Gamble DRC

 Performance 
       Timeline  
McKesson 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in McKesson are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward-looking signals, McKesson showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Procter Gamble DRC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble DRC has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

McKesson and Procter Gamble Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with McKesson and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite McKesson and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if McKesson position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.
The idea behind McKesson and Procter Gamble DRC pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets