Correlation Between Procter Gamble and McKesson

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and McKesson at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and McKesson into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble DRC and McKesson, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and McKesson and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of McKesson. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and McKesson.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and McKesson

0.31
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and McKesson is 0.31. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble DRC and McKesson in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on McKesson and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble DRC are associated (or correlated) with McKesson. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of McKesson has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and McKesson go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and McKesson

Assuming the 90 days horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 41.25 times less return on investment than McKesson. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Procter Gamble DRC is 2.05 times less risky than McKesson. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. McKesson is currently generating about 0.16 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,010,057  in McKesson on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  189,511  from holding McKesson or generate 18.76% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy97.62%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble DRC  vs.  McKesson

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble DRC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble DRC has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
McKesson 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in McKesson are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward-looking signals, McKesson showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Procter Gamble and McKesson Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and McKesson

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and McKesson positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, McKesson can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in McKesson will offset losses from the drop in McKesson's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble DRC and McKesson pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Crypto Correlations module to use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing