Correlation Between Litigation Capital and SupplyMe Capital

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and SupplyMe Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and SupplyMe Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and SupplyMe Capital PLC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and SupplyMe Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of SupplyMe Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and SupplyMe Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and SupplyMe Capital

-0.83
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Litigation and SupplyMe is -0.83. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and SupplyMe Capital PLC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on SupplyMe Capital PLC and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with SupplyMe Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of SupplyMe Capital PLC has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and SupplyMe Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and SupplyMe Capital

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital Management is expected to generate 0.23 times more return on investment than SupplyMe Capital. However, Litigation Capital Management is 4.27 times less risky than SupplyMe Capital. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. SupplyMe Capital PLC is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  9,382  in Litigation Capital Management on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,368  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 25.24% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Litigation Capital Management  vs.  SupplyMe Capital PLC

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
SupplyMe Capital PLC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days SupplyMe Capital PLC has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Litigation Capital and SupplyMe Capital Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and SupplyMe Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and SupplyMe Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, SupplyMe Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in SupplyMe Capital will offset losses from the drop in SupplyMe Capital's long position.
The idea behind Litigation Capital Management and SupplyMe Capital PLC pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data