Correlation Between SupplyMe Capital and Litigation Capital

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both SupplyMe Capital and Litigation Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining SupplyMe Capital and Litigation Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between SupplyMe Capital PLC and Litigation Capital Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on SupplyMe Capital and Litigation Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in SupplyMe Capital with a short position of Litigation Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of SupplyMe Capital and Litigation Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for SupplyMe Capital and Litigation Capital

-0.84
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between SupplyMe and Litigation is -0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding SupplyMe Capital PLC and Litigation Capital Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Litigation Capital and SupplyMe Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on SupplyMe Capital PLC are associated (or correlated) with Litigation Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Litigation Capital has no effect on the direction of SupplyMe Capital i.e., SupplyMe Capital and Litigation Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between SupplyMe Capital and Litigation Capital

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon SupplyMe Capital PLC is expected to under-perform the Litigation Capital. In addition to that, SupplyMe Capital is 4.33 times more volatile than Litigation Capital Management. It trades about -0.1 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Litigation Capital Management is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  10,814  in Litigation Capital Management on September 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,011  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 9.35% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

SupplyMe Capital PLC  vs.  Litigation Capital Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
SupplyMe Capital PLC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days SupplyMe Capital PLC has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

SupplyMe Capital and Litigation Capital Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with SupplyMe Capital and Litigation Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite SupplyMe Capital and Litigation Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if SupplyMe Capital position performs unexpectedly, Litigation Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Litigation Capital will offset losses from the drop in Litigation Capital's long position.
The idea behind SupplyMe Capital PLC and Litigation Capital Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Insider Screener module to find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets